White Paper Discuss: Eclipse for Robotics

[EricS-Team180]

Originally Posted by coastertux

I followed your instructuons but when I went to start a new project, the Microchip option was not on the dropdown for Project Type.

Steve, Have you had any luck fixing this? I've tried the same thing with an Ubuntu linux distro and I have the same problem.

Thanks
Eric

[Astronouth7303]

Originally Posted by EricS-Team180

Steve, Have you had any luck fixing this? I've tried the same thing with an Ubuntu linux distro and I have the same problem.

Thanks
Eric

run eclipse with the -clean option, then try it.

[EricS-Team180]

Originally Posted by Astronouth7303

run eclipse with the -clean option, then try it.

no luck...

I am able to create a GNU c/c++ project, and GNU, GNU on windows and GNU on MAC OS X are available, but no microchip reference


btw, when I go to put the .jar file in a plugins directory, I find
/usr/share/eclipse/plugins
/usr/local/share/eclipse/plugins
/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins
/usr/local/lib/eclipse/plugins

so which one? I copied the .jar to /usr/share/eclipse/plugins and soft-linked it elsewhere

any ideas?

Thanks
Eric

[EricS-Team180]

Originally Posted by EricS-Team180

no luck...
any ideas?
Eric

OK...re-read Using Eclipse thread and figured it out...

[MikeN]

Hello all

I have been using MPLAB for a while, and was already using eclipse, so the chance to junk MPLAB was eagerly taken!

I have Windows XP, with eclipse 3.1.1 with CDT_SDK 3.0.1. I installed minGW (via the MSYS install), set up my paths and off we went.

I have had a number of problems, some soleved, some went away, one remaining, as below

1. Flags for error level is incorrect -nw=x - should be -w=x. Sorted by editing the .xml file (after unzipping from .jar file)
2. I wanted to specify the large memory model, so again modified the xml.
3. The del /f command doesn't work - it is built in in win32 not a stand alone command. The cleanCommand doesn't seem to be acted upon, so (temporarily) I copied minGW rm.exe to del.exe and that works. Makes no difference, as eclipse clears the build directory prior to doing a make clean (via project/clean), but it works.
4. The minGW make seems to do something odd - the linker tries to read the a:/ drive and can't, giving an error. Again temporarily I tried a make from gnuWIN, and that seems to do what is expected.
5. The default library FRC_Library.lib which I don't use would not go away when deleted from the project properties so I removed that from the xml file as well. Also the unneeded -D_FRC_BOARD flag for the compiler.

I had some problems which have gone away - principally the linker looking in the wrong place for the object files. The compiler was putting them in the build directory, the linker looked in the source directory. This has gone away - I didn't do anything obvious.

6. Finally the one thats left (may be a feature!). There is no dependency checking done. If I modify a header file, the relevant object are not rebuild. Is this expected?

I will post my modified xml file if its of interest, when I have had a bit longer to go over it.

I welcome any comments on any aspect of the above

Regards Mike Newsome

[Astronouth7303]

Most of the mods you've described I've also done. (The only thing missing is ASM compilation.) Basically, I've added complete compilation options. (Within limits of the system.) (I've also made a generic makefile. It compiles all your c & asm files and links them together. Not quite ready to release it, though.)

As far as Make goes, that's the nature of the MinGW make. It interprets /w et al as w:\. I'm pretty sure that the linker will accept -w style flags, but I know for sure mpasm won't. Cygwin won't do this, but interprets \ as an escape character.

I wasn't able to fine Make on the gnuWin website; maybe you could link us?

[MikeN]

Originally Posted by Astronouth7303

I wasn't able to fine Make on the gnuWin website; maybe you could link us?

I found this collection http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ which seems to do everything I wanted.

Have you got the proper dependencies working? That would be nice!

Regards Mike N