|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not to be a Negative Nancy here, but this game looks (edit by Joe J.) not as good as I imagine it might be. My first impression was that no one will understand the rules and it will be chaos on the field. Does anybody else feel this way?
Last edited by Joe Johnson : 07-01-2006 at 18:37. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
no.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
Quote:
You probably won't really know how the game is til you actually see a real competition. Just give it a chance. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
It is actually the most simple game I've ever seen on FIRST. Shoot balls, get on the ramp, each alliance gets its turn. Want me to draw a picture?
![]() I believe it will be fun to watch but a nightmare to design the robot! Devious! ![]() Also, please refer to this post. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
This is the first year we have ever been able to launch things...
I suggest you read this: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=41233 EDIT: someone beat me too it by a few seconds... I'm going to leave this up anyway. Last edited by team222badbrad : 07-01-2006 at 17:05. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
I am all for this game, The rules are easy to understand and the game is on the diffucult side to stratigize for and design for. Which i am excited to start the designing and building.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
Quote:
I think the game has just as many rules as last year and that once read, it will be a very fast paced, exciting match. From what I've seen and thought so far, the new bumper rules and height adds a tremendous amount of possibility to this game. Every year many teams want to put on protection but must sacrifice them for weight constraints. Also looking back at the 2004 game, the 5' maximum height creates a defensive strategy based more on driving. I think once the rules are completely read and teams start brainstorming and mocking out the game, the game will be very enjoyable just as years past. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
Quote:
Edit: Why was the title changed? I don't mind that it was changed, but there's no indication given in the original post that it was, thereby misrepresenting the original poster's thoughts. Last edited by Reyner : 07-01-2006 at 17:12. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will suck?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will not be as good as I imagine it might be?
I think the game gives rookies a fairly easy task to do (simply push) while giving the veterans something higher to aim for (figuratively and literally).
Thank you GDC. It looks great. Now...time to inventory. ![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will not be as good as I imagine it might be?
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will not be as good as I imagine it might be?
First off, we generally don't mind people being negative as long as you can back it up. Someone saying "This games sucks!" is wasting a post. Someone who says "I think there will be chaos on the field and the audience won't understand what is going on and this is why I think that..." is helping a productive debate be accomplished. Someone saying "Don't dis the game that way this game will rock" is wasting just as much of a post as saying "I hate this game", besides the fact that they are patting the GDC on the back, which the GDC always deserves (I dont' even want to think how many hours they put into this).
Now, I think the GDC hit a homerun on this one. While it is a tad complicated, if you understand the rules, it will be a blast to watch. Come on, each alliance has 40 seconds in which all they do is play defense on an alliance attempting to score! We will see the return of those jaw dropping plays we saw in 2004. Also robots shooting balls into goals is quite a concept which I am anxiously awaiting the development of. Good job GDC and FIRST, you've got me on the edge of my seat! Last edited by Ian Curtis : 07-01-2006 at 20:46. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will not be as good as I imagine it might be?
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does anyone else think this game will not be as good as I imagine it might be?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TRIPLE PLAY the Flash Game | webmaster1444 | Website Design/Showcase | 53 | 15-02-2007 23:52 |
| [Official 2006 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2006 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 29 | 08-01-2006 00:21 |
| Good Night, and Good Luck. | Ken Leung | Chit-Chat | 2 | 25-10-2005 11:09 |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 42 | 26-04-2005 19:19 |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Game Elements and Subtasks | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 60 | 19-10-2004 21:06 |