|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Quote:
2004 Mayhem on the Merrimack Fastest Robot Award! But remember tank treads are slow... Time for you to get your facts straight Quote:
Last edited by BillyGoats : 08-01-2006 at 15:59. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
tank treads are def not slow, but honestly there is no need for them in this years game. Theres no terrian obstacles other then the 30 degree ramp which shouldnt be a problem to get up. i would go 6 wheel drive and just chain the wheels
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
ya you get just as much traction with the pneumatic wheels with those big CIMs it wont be necessary to use tank treads and if any team is smart they will use a pneumatic brakepad system to hold their ground while shooting at the center goal
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
I'll bite. This year's game will not be friendly to omni wheel drives (unless you can shoot extremely accurately on the fly). It will also not be friendly to tank treads, although I am not sure that is what you meant. Tank does not mean tank treads you guys. It could mean a skid steer system, which would be good, unless you want to go ramp climbing. Although after last year and 116's incredibly wicked sweet drive, I'm sure you can think of something cool.
Last edited by Ian Curtis : 08-01-2006 at 22:01. Reason: forgot a parenthese |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Quote:
Last edited by Chris Fultz : 11-01-2006 at 21:03. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
it is possible for a crab drive or an omni drive to get up the ramp with the help of another robot. There will be plenty of tankbots that can push them ramp, just make those wheel/motor assemblies strong.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
I think a crab could get up in its own but an omni would need the assistance of a dropdown high traction roller of some sort.
I think a crab is perfect for the game, but I don't think my team wants to go that way. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Quote:
My team has used a four wheel drive system with doubled up wheels wrapped in tread(from McMaster Carr) and two pneumatically activated castor wheels. If all four wheels are on the floor the robot has a LOT of traction and works well as a defensive robot. If the castors are actuated and pushes the front wheels up, it gives it the manuevarability required in the FIRST games. We have found this to work quite well. On the topic on tank drives, it is a very hard thing to perfectly execute. Tank drives require a lot of work and the result is not very much advantageous over a normal four wheel drive system. These are just my thoughts. The game dynamics on the field will also have a great say on the reliability and advantages of each of these different systems. Good Luck |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Omni bots will have a place in this year's game, although I dont know if 116 will use a holonomic drive again. More advanced programming teams may like omni-drives to "shoot on the fly", especially if they dont develope a turret system for their launcher. Agility and speed will be essential in reaching the corner goals/HP stations, because you CANNOT power your way to them (youll just jam the opponent into the corner, and its gonna be near impossible to get them out).
It is POSSIBLE to create an active suspension system, although very difficult, for a holonomic or mechanum drive to get up the ramp. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
if it werent our "first" year doing this we would push for omni or crab drive... and it would be nice if the "shooter" were ALWAYS pointed at the goal. no matter which way the joystick is puished the robot moves int the x/y accordingly but the programming keeps the front faced towards the goal.
i guess a rotating top would do as well |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
regarding the tank treads- it's not so much that they're slow, it's that they're not good for turning, which will probably end up being an important part of this game.
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Quote:
I'm pretty sure that team 648 is going with a crab steer system and that is the perfect drive system for that design idea. This will also be our first year for crab but we have been testing design and coding on the Robovation bot. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Tank treads would be profitable if you can get the gear ratio adjusted so that its fast enough to keep up. Problem is, the biggest advantage of having treads is their grip and strength on the carpet. So gearing it for speed would lose the power aspect of having treads.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: omni drive vs tank
Quote:
If you look at the video you will see how fast we run at. we would be one of the fastest robot on the floor. but with the most power. you are right you have to get the gearing right. we always used 4 motors for the drivetrain. how fast do you want to go. to fast and you have no control. Now with multi gear shifting we have all we need. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If you could change one thing.... | Koko Ed | General Forum | 48 | 31-03-2005 19:23 |
| Tank Drive help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Idaman323 | Programming | 3 | 18-02-2005 15:17 |
| Tank Drive | Idaman323 | Programming | 14 | 15-02-2005 09:01 |
| Swerve/crab drive and tank turning | activemx | Technical Discussion | 9 | 23-02-2004 18:26 |
| tank drive | Stormhammer | Programming | 11 | 29-01-2004 23:08 |