|
|
|
 It's very confusing to other people on the message boards when you make things up that are incorrect and assert them as fact. Please don't do this. - Dave Flowerday [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you like the new alliance selection order? | |||
| Approve of the change |
  
|
72 | 62.07% |
| Liked the old system |
  
|
44 | 37.93% |
| Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
09-01-2006, 08:57
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule 8.4.1
I think that this is the way it should be.
Number one seeds already get the best team available when they pick first. They can pick number two or three. What ever they want. I like the new way they are doing it. Thats the way that we run my family fantasy football draft. I think that is the best way to do it and make it some what fair. The reason why you are number one is because you are good. If you choose number two then those are the two best robots at the regional or championship division. The number eight seed is getting the worst end of it if you go back to the old way where they pick then have to wait another eight picks to pick. I always see the first seed beat out the eighth seed. every now and then they beat the "powerhouse" that is the first seed. I think its only fair. Stevie |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion | Andy Baker | General Forum | 53 | 28-10-2005 22:23 |
| [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005 | Ken Patton | General Forum | 20 | 11-06-2005 14:19 |
| Rule Changes at off season competitions | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 23 | 11-05-2004 22:39 |
Threaded Mode