|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Second FIRST Ball Launcher
Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Second FIRST Ball Launcher
The thud you just heard was made by the game designers when they hit the floor after fainting.
You guys must have missed the Kickoff opening segment on safety! Nice way to remove ceiling tiles. ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Second FIRST Ball Launcher
Wow. I can only imagine 5-6 robots on a field firing balls like that, lol. 3000rpm is ALOT....and pretty dangerous, I can tell that they will be very picky when it comes to passing in Inspection (probably will want a safety gaurd [lexan] all the way around anything that moves at a high rpm like that).
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Second FIRST Ball Launcher
My students may be reading this, so I don't want to put a damper on their parade, but we're going to scale back that thing a lot
![]() It's unsafe, too powerful, and too big. However, they were looking for proof that they could actually launch the ball far enough. We kept asking them "ok it looks cool on paper, but how fast does this need to go? how much torque? how big of a wheel?" until they decided to build a prototype and test it. This thing only took a few minutes to build and we only launched the ball twice. It's now decommissioned ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Second FIRST Ball Launcher
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poll: What kind of ball launcher do you have | Rickertsen2 | Technical Discussion | 3 | 12-01-2006 23:13 |
| First FIRST ball launcher? | Rick TYler | Technical Discussion | 13 | 10-01-2006 22:42 |
| Experimental Ball Drive | Sepsis900 | Technical Discussion | 16 | 31-10-2005 16:59 |
| Lip at ball chute opening | Doug Traster | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 19-01-2004 01:33 |
| Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:13 |