|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you like the new alliance selection order? | |||
| Approve of the change |
|
72 | 62.07% |
| Liked the old system |
|
44 | 37.93% |
| Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule 8.4.1
Because no team gets to the first seed by luck or the associated machinations of 16 teams.
You've gotta be a darn good robot to take advantage of all the opportunities afforded to you by the help (or hurt) of 16 other alliance partners. Besides, you forget that teams can pick from within the top 8. So you're grabbing a lot lower of a pick than you might otherwise imagine. --Petey |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion | Andy Baker | General Forum | 53 | 28-10-2005 22:23 |
| [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005 | Ken Patton | General Forum | 20 | 11-06-2005 14:19 |
| Rule Changes at off season competitions | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 23 | 11-05-2004 22:39 |