|
|
|
 The toughest part about that Chairman's Award was the fact that someone was cutting onions in the stands near 558/on the field while it was being read out. At least that was the excuse I'm going to use ;) - esquared [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CMUcam test rules...
One of the inputs to our design team working on the shooter is how realiable the targeting system can be. There is no need for them to try and get distance of the 40+ range if we can't target there. Realistically we're not likely to shoot anywhere near that but, and if we could it would require a great deal of investigation and effort over say a 20 foot shooter. We wanted to determine if they could grant us that type of system, could we really use it. From our testing it doesn't seem likely we could use it so our shooting distance will likely be shorter...
-Terry |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Major CMUcam issues - LabView app won't work, very low-quality picture | scottmso | Programming | 5 | 19-01-2006 17:51 |
| Powering CMUcam without full-size RC? | Mike | Programming | 3 | 17-01-2006 22:56 |
| CMUcam for Dummies? | nosaj4268 | Programming | 2 | 14-01-2006 23:55 |
| CMUcam setup | Ryan Collings | Programming | 26 | 13-01-2006 01:00 |
| Screwed up results? | TheFork | 3D Animation and Competition | 18 | 18-05-2002 15:47 |
Hybrid Mode
