Go to Post "The rio has a boulder sized hole though it? *shrug* Just duct tape it. That doesn't let the code out, right?" - Bkeeneykid [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: should a height violation while extending count?
yes 31 79.49%
no 2 5.13%
only if it is a gross violation 5 12.82%
extending out? 1 2.56%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2006, 08:33
Taylor's Avatar
Taylor Taylor is offline
Professor of Thinkology, ThD
AKA: @taylorstem
FRC #3487 (Red Pride Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA 46227
Posts: 4,599
Taylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: height violation while extending

Quote:
Originally Posted by Budda648
This is exactly what I was thinking. My suggestion would be to design away from anything that could potentially break the 60" plane or make the extension short enough or at a lesser degree that it would not break the plane. But then again... is it stable as it moves up and out?
I interpret the rule and the "stable" terminology as meaning controlled. If the robot is moving parts on its own and breaks the 60" plane, that would be controlled movement and as part of the design of the robot, the 60" plane is broken, which results in a penalty. "Unstable", in my eyes, is an instance in which an external force is acting on the robot (another robot, a game piece) and causing it to change its orientation. So, the short answer is yes, if at any time during the match a robot exceeds 60" UNLESS it is caused by an external force, there should be a penalty. The thing about it is the refs would have to have a trained eye to look out for these things, and some infractions may not be caught. I look for the GP in each team to make sure the robot and its design don't break the rules.
__________________
Hi!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Height of basket Max Brin Technical Discussion 1 12-01-2006 14:43
Dimension Wanted - BOM Caster: floor to top plate surface height kmcclary Kit & Additional Hardware 2 28-01-2004 12:02
Ball Tee height Dave... Rules/Strategy 2 11-01-2004 01:29
Railing height archiver 2000 1 24-06-2002 00:17
height questions Team461 Off-Season Events 3 29-10-2001 21:51


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi