|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The Chester Challenge 2006
Well I heard your comments and talked to the team and I am p-leased to announce team 25's Chester Challenge for 2006. In honor of Mr. John Chester , a team parent and adult member engineer, we will offer a trophy tiki to the first ALLIANCE to complete the following task. To claim the prize we need confirmation from an official at the event that this task was indeed accomplished in an official FIRST competition seeding or elimination round and please include the exact time of it.
The 2006 Challenge- Everybody seems to be able to shoot the balls into the high center goal. We propose that we will award the TIKI to the first ALLIANCE where all three robots, from start position in the starting boxes and in autonomous mode, score all 30 balls carried by the 3 robots into the high center goal. all 30 balls- 90 pts- all in the 10 second autonomous mode I know this is an EASY challenge for this year. Somebody will do it. Will it be week 1- or week 10? I am eager to see who steps up to the challenge. The TIKI is still waiting from last season, I'll even dust it off for you. Now get to it!! WC ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
I don't think it going to work, especially if you have all the robot shooting at once from the same position. You get at least 8-10, maybe 15 but not all 30 balls in.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
Impossible? Explain..... what rules say you cant shoot from the start position? This is far more possible than scoring the viso n tetra on the center goal in 15 seconds..... |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
OK - much as I hate to give in to nay-sayers- I'll alter the challenge- the first Allliance that scores 90 ball-points (sans bonus) in the autonomous mode from ANYWHERE on the field and in an official FIRST seeding or elimination round will win the TIKI. So--I made it easy for you- can you do that? I think its too easy but ..... WC ![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
I looked up the field drawings and did a quick check
the center starting position box is 27' along the long side of the field to the end, and 13' from the center. Knocking off a few feet to the middle of the box, its 11'. (27^2 + 11^2) ^ 0.5 = 29 feet to the bottom of the goal at floor height. The example FIRST gave for the 12M/S ball speed limit says the ball will travel 35 feet if fired at max speed with a 30° angle. Thats 35 feet to where it hits the floor. So its looking like you would have to exceed the muzzle velocity limit to swish balls through the goal from the center starting postion, or the one further away. One other factor: the way the bots are all lined up along one side, will the two farthest bots be able to shoot towards the center goal without hitting the next bot in the back of the head? |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
i think the hardest part of this challenge will be that the balls would have to be timed so that they do not hit each other in mid air wich would cause them to bounce off each other and not go in.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
that means each ball is flying at 1/2 S intervals, which will put them 6 meters apart thats a lot of space between the balls in flight: 10" balls with 226" of empty space between them the odds of two balls hitting in flight is 10/226 = about 5 out of 100. The odds are 20:1 in your favor (no collisions in midair) |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
ya this has nothing to do with the subject but I need help trying to post or what ever it is that you have to do to put a question on the website... thanks
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
Quote:
So, you have ten, 3 balls instances of clearing. At two seconds apart. So, to clear all the balls, it would be 10*2 =20 seconds to clear all the balls completely. So, by the end of the ten seconds, there would be ten seconds of balls to clear, backed up. (10/2)*3 balls~15 balls left So at the end of the period (through my rough estimation), there are fifteen balls to clear, or, towards the end of the autonomous period, there are 10 or 12 to get in the way. I wonder if 10 or 12 balls, some still jangling around, could present enough of an obstacle to prevent some incoming balls from coming in? And what about the feeder chute? I wonder if that'll jam? I think, on top of needing a killer alliance to do it, this challenge is going to be harder than the intro suggests... |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Chester Challenge 2006
two weeks over- and the TIKI is still safe at home
Thirty balls scored in autonomous? Three robots each getting all three balls in the center goal? A 100 point autonomous round... Could the challenge AGAIN be beyond the abilities of the ENTIRE FIRST community? True- the new alliance picking rules seem to inhibit alliances of three hot shooters. But how many bots are scoring 10 balls in autonomous anyway? I predict that IF this challenge can be met it wont happen until the elimination rounds at the Nationals. Until then the TIKI continues to gather dust..... WC ![]() Last edited by Wayne C. : 12-03-2006 at 21:53. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 Pennsylvania Robot Challenge (PARC) | team222badbrad | Off-Season Events | 91 | 17-05-2006 15:45 |
| DARPA Grand Challenge 2006 | mechanicalbrain | Chit-Chat | 4 | 12-01-2006 23:00 |
| pic: A New Challenge in 2006 | Noah Melamed | Extra Discussion | 2 | 12-01-2006 12:29 |
| [Official 2006 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2006 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 29 | 08-01-2006 00:21 |