|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which system is prefered and realisticaly the best | |||
| One Joystick for left wheels, one for right |
|
63 | 69.23% |
| One joystick for speed, one for turning |
|
2 | 2.20% |
| one joystick for everything |
|
20 | 21.98% |
| Our robot doesnt use that drive system |
|
6 | 6.59% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
We have "Halo Drive" (as coined by me for our team). We have the same control scheme as in Halo, left joystick is left, right, forward, and back, while keeping the same heading, and the right joystick controls rotation. And it drives soo heavenly and smooth, a nice change over our overly frictionated (cool word) tank drive from last year. Its the most maneuverable little chassis I've ever personally seen.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
Team 435 : we have always used one controler, in the begining we had to intergrade the two controles in to one controler which was a pain in setting up the condinate system of the joystick. but now we can spend time on other things b/c the code is given to us for one joystick to control both driving wheels left and right
Last edited by Madison : 05-02-2006 at 00:44. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
That font is very, very hard to read.
We use tank.. I wouldn't have it any other way.. It is by far the best, as far as I can tell (Try to do this with a single joystick: Go forward, spin around one of the back wheels to 180, and go straight forward) ![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
This is interesting. Way more teams voting for two joysticks than one.
The one joystick really isn't that much harder to program. I worked it out on paper in about 15 minutes then typed that straight into the computer. I spent about 30 minutes (that is, 30 minutes of actually working) debugging it when the tracks on the bot kept randomly reversing/ignoring dead bands/spinning the same way. Our team still has to make some motor linearization code and tweak the code but for the most part it's done. I think that one joystick is easier to control and leaves the operator's other hand free for a possible second joystick/panel for weapons control. We learned last year that it's best not to have two drivers. That's very hard to coordinate correctly sometimes. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
I really perfer 2 joystick tankdrive because it gives you absolute control of the robot, you can control either side of you your drivetrain at any speed you want any time you want. However I do think that 1 joystick would be easier for people that havnt ever driven a robot before.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
We started with both one- and two-joystick options last year. Yes, one joystick was easier for people who had never driven a robot before. However, for those with experience (or after a bit of practice), it was much easier to control using two joysticks.
The issue of turning while going backwards leads to some seriously nonintuitive behavior when using a single joystick. There are fixes, but none seem entirely satisfactory to me. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
Tank drive for the win (hehe)! Some members of our electrical team go in for differential steering (one for speed, one for turning) but us programmers will turn them around. I agree with the poll results. If tank drive were unavailable, one for all and all for one would make sense.
Paul Dennis |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
We split the responsibility of operating the robot between two people, a driver and an operator. The driver controls the robot's placement on the field and the speed of the drive while the operator is responsible for any appendages.I was the driver for my team in the 2005 season. I also drove the robot at the 2004-2005 IRI. I have driven with both single and double joystick controls. Personally, I fell more confident with two joysticks. Many people have said that two joysticks are easier to control for the experienced driver. I suggest that if your team plans on rotating drivers during the season that you use single stick controls. However, if you have enough time during the build season to practice driving, go with a two stick drive.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
clearly, a dance dance revolution pad is the way to go as to how to control the robot. just kidding
I don't think FIRST would approve...seriously though, when I was the base driver last year, our team experimented with both the one stick and the two stick drive. I prefer the two stick drive because it allows for versatility and it is easy to make small adjustments. Also, the two stick system allows me to rotate on a dime and on the fly. It is easy to maneuver. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
I recall (My brain's fired from a Bio Test) one year the toggle box with all the controls had two key switches:
1. Changed the direction of the tank drive. Forward was backwards and vice versa to allow quick controls 2. Switched between 1 joystick control for movement and tank drive. Whether or not they were helped I don't remember but the First switch got a few nods for use that year (Zone Zeal) |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
We were thinking about a neural interface, but decided against it just in case our driver has undiagnosed ADD:
OK, drive forward, turn 20 degrees right....ooh! look at that pretty girl in the stands...LOOK OUT!!! |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
well, the total control of tank drive can be simulated using a good programmer who can give you diagonals and tolerance levels so like if u push foward and then a little to the left, it'll just slightly bend left
~D |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
As far as between tank drive and one stick drive, I find tank drive much easier to use. One thing that I would really like to try is thumbsticks (maybe time to pick up an old analog gamepad...) and have the left stick as the forward and backwards, and the right stick as the left and right.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Concept of PID explained | ConKbot of Doom | Technical Discussion | 11 | 27-01-2008 00:11 |
| Control Scheme | Drok00 | Control System | 5 | 19-01-2006 16:57 |
| Best Driving scheme? | Issues | Programming | 6 | 16-11-2005 15:53 |
| 2005 RadioShack Innovation In Control Award--What Won? | Billfred | Control System | 8 | 12-06-2005 01:51 |
| How did you control your Robot? 1? 2? Wheel? How? | ChrisCook | Control System | 9 | 17-05-2005 21:41 |