|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which system is prefered and realisticaly the best | |||
| One Joystick for left wheels, one for right |
|
63 | 69.23% |
| One joystick for speed, one for turning |
|
2 | 2.20% |
| one joystick for everything |
|
20 | 21.98% |
| Our robot doesnt use that drive system |
|
6 | 6.59% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
clearly, a dance dance revolution pad is the way to go as to how to control the robot. just kidding
I don't think FIRST would approve...seriously though, when I was the base driver last year, our team experimented with both the one stick and the two stick drive. I prefer the two stick drive because it allows for versatility and it is easy to make small adjustments. Also, the two stick system allows me to rotate on a dime and on the fly. It is easy to maneuver. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
I recall (My brain's fired from a Bio Test) one year the toggle box with all the controls had two key switches:
1. Changed the direction of the tank drive. Forward was backwards and vice versa to allow quick controls 2. Switched between 1 joystick control for movement and tank drive. Whether or not they were helped I don't remember but the First switch got a few nods for use that year (Zone Zeal) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
We were thinking about a neural interface, but decided against it just in case our driver has undiagnosed ADD:
OK, drive forward, turn 20 degrees right....ooh! look at that pretty girl in the stands...LOOK OUT!!! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
well, the total control of tank drive can be simulated using a good programmer who can give you diagonals and tolerance levels so like if u push foward and then a little to the left, it'll just slightly bend left
~D |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
As far as between tank drive and one stick drive, I find tank drive much easier to use. One thing that I would really like to try is thumbsticks (maybe time to pick up an old analog gamepad...) and have the left stick as the forward and backwards, and the right stick as the left and right.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
we actually HAVE to use two-joystick drive so that we can program in all the driving "extras" we need for this year's competition. It'd be too hard to program them in with 1 joystick drive. plus our drivers are used to tank drive (drivers are all juniors)....
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Concept of PID explained | ConKbot of Doom | Technical Discussion | 11 | 27-01-2008 00:11 |
| Control Scheme | Drok00 | Control System | 5 | 19-01-2006 16:57 |
| Best Driving scheme? | Issues | Programming | 6 | 16-11-2005 15:53 |
| 2005 RadioShack Innovation In Control Award--What Won? | Billfred | Control System | 8 | 12-06-2005 01:51 |
| How did you control your Robot? 1? 2? Wheel? How? | ChrisCook | Control System | 9 | 17-05-2005 21:41 |