Go to Post Bumper quality is an "attention to detail" measure. Teams that get little things right tend to do better on the big things. - vhcook [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Which system is prefered and realisticaly the best
One Joystick for left wheels, one for right 63 69.23%
One joystick for speed, one for turning 2 2.20%
one joystick for everything 20 21.98%
Our robot doesnt use that drive system 6 6.59%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 07:37
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Driving control scheme?

We started with both one- and two-joystick options last year. Yes, one joystick was easier for people who had never driven a robot before. However, for those with experience (or after a bit of practice), it was much easier to control using two joysticks.

The issue of turning while going backwards leads to some seriously nonintuitive behavior when using a single joystick. There are fixes, but none seem entirely satisfactory to me.
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 08:56
bobotics319 bobotics319 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Andrew Levasseur
FRC #0319 (Bobotics)
Team Role: Communications
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Alton, NH
Posts: 20
bobotics319 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Driving control scheme?

Team 319 is a Tank Drive.. we have used it for a long time... but this year we might try to make a Xbox control work with the system... or a PS2...
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 09:25
dachickindapit dachickindapit is offline
Registered User
AKA: Gina Sweet
FRC #0033 (The Killer Bees)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 67
dachickindapit is a name known to alldachickindapit is a name known to alldachickindapit is a name known to alldachickindapit is a name known to alldachickindapit is a name known to alldachickindapit is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to dachickindapit Send a message via Yahoo to dachickindapit
Re: Driving control scheme?

We've used both in the past. Most of the time, we consult our drivers and see what they would prefer. After all, they are the ones interfacing with the machine most frequently!

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH
Tank drive (having one joystick control each side) is the most popular system in FIRST. It's simple, the driver practically doesn't have to think (well, he does, but it's more intuitive.) Having one control speed and the other turning--just use a steering wheel if you can find one that interfaces with the RC; or just use one joystick. The problem with this system is it's very hard to turn fast, unlike two sticks. If you must use an x and y system, use one stick, but two joysticks is preferred.
We used a pretty unique system last year. We had a 3-wheel swerve drive on our machine, so we couldn't use the standard tank drive. We used a joystick for throttle and a steering wheel for directionality. It seems very complicated to figure out, but it's actually pretty intuitive. I ran the robot in some demonstrations where the students couldn't attend, and it was definitely different, but I would use that control system again. If you try to use a swerve drive with it, make sure you have a good programmer! We actually ran out of space in the RC to be able to do everything we wanted to last year because of the swerve-drive code.

As far as finding a steering wheel goes, I think we brought one in from someone's old collection and modified the connector. It worked just fine.
__________________
2017-??: Team 33 -- The Killer Bees
2001-2016: Team 67 -- The Heroes of Tomorrow
1997: FLL Pilot Program

**Controls and Electrical Systems for who knows how many years now**
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 10:09
Ethulin Ethulin is offline
Too many hats to count
AKA: Erik Thulin
FRC #0492 (Titan Robotics)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 245
Ethulin has much to be proud ofEthulin has much to be proud ofEthulin has much to be proud ofEthulin has much to be proud ofEthulin has much to be proud ofEthulin has much to be proud ofEthulin has much to be proud ofEthulin has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Ethulin
Re: Driving control scheme?

No joysticks!

Thats right, the 492 base driver will not ven be using a joystick this year.

I don't wana spoil the suprise so you will just have to watch the PAC NW regional 1st week.
__________________
2003 Pacific Northwest Regional Website Award || 2003 Pacific Northwest Regional Finalist || 2003 Pacific Northwest Regional Engineering Inspiration Award || 2004 Pacific Northwest Website Award || 2004 Pacific Northwest Regional Champions (#1 seed) || 2004 Galileo Semi-Finalist || 2005 Pacific Northwest Regional General Motors Industiral Design Award || 2005 Pacific Northwest Regional Champions (#1 seed) || 2005 Galileo Finalist || 2006 Pacific Northwest Regional Chairman's
Stamp Scouting || Titan Robotics
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 10:22
David55 David55 is offline
Registered User
AKA: David Hillman
FRC #1577 (Steampunk) & FRC #125 (NUTRONS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Raanana, Israel / Boston, MA
Posts: 279
David55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Driving control scheme?

A former student on our team, Daniel Gutmanas, came up with a code for perfect driving using just one joystick (nothing to do with the default code).
You can find all the information here: http://www.avivrobotics.net/tutorials/mixing.pdf

Also visit our team's site : http://www.avivrobotics.net

correction: In the article he wrote team 1557, meaning team 1577# - steampunk robotics (all those sleepless nights programming kinda confused him)

Last edited by David55 : 01-02-2006 at 10:25.
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 11:06
EricS-Team180's Avatar
EricS-Team180 EricS-Team180 is offline
SPAM, the lunchmeat of superheroes!
AKA: Eric Schreffler
FRC #0180 (SPAM)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Stuart, Florida
Posts: 561
EricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond reputeEricS-Team180 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Driving control scheme?

1 stick or 2...
This is always a hot debate in the FRC. Please see my comments (and those of others) from 2003 in this thread:

one stick or two stick drivv?


Eric
__________________

Don't PANIC!
S. P. A. M.
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 11:39
aaeamdar's Avatar
aaeamdar aaeamdar is offline
Post-A-Holic
AKA: Paul Dennis
FRC #1719 (The Umbrella Corp)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 231
aaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant futureaaeamdar has a brilliant future
Re: Driving control scheme?

Tank drive for the win (hehe)! Some members of our electrical team go in for differential steering (one for speed, one for turning) but us programmers will turn them around. I agree with the poll results. If tank drive were unavailable, one for all and all for one would make sense.

Paul Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 14:07
samson234's Avatar
samson234 samson234 is offline
Head Lathe Operator
AKA: Sam Harding
FRC #0234 (Cyberblue)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Indiana,Indianapolis
Posts: 17
samson234 will become famous soon enough
Re: Driving control scheme?

We split the responsibility of operating the robot between two people, a driver and an operator. The driver controls the robot's placement on the field and the speed of the drive while the operator is responsible for any appendages.I was the driver for my team in the 2005 season. I also drove the robot at the 2004-2005 IRI. I have driven with both single and double joystick controls. Personally, I fell more confident with two joysticks. Many people have said that two joysticks are easier to control for the experienced driver. I suggest that if your team plans on rotating drivers during the season that you use single stick controls. However, if you have enough time during the build season to practice driving, go with a two stick drive.
__________________
"It takes a little over an hour."
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 14:56
Kim Masi's Avatar
Kim Masi Kim Masi is offline
125 Member, cause Brando says so :p
FRC #0125 (NUTRONS)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 343
Kim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kim Masi
Re: Driving control scheme?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bombadier337
We have "Halo Drive" (as coined by me for our team). We have the same control scheme as in Halo, left joystick is left, right, forward, and back, while keeping the same heading, and the right joystick controls rotation. And it drives soo heavenly and smooth, a nice change over our overly frictionated (cool word) tank drive from last year. Its the most maneuverable little chassis I've ever personally seen.
What kind of wheels did you use for this configuration? it sounds very intriguing. but what kind of rotation were you controlling? is that the rotation of the drive train? or the shoulder mechanism?
__________________
Bobcat Robotics-Team 177: 2004-2007
The NUTRONS-Team 125: 2008-2009, 2011-2012ish
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 15:04
Kim Masi's Avatar
Kim Masi Kim Masi is offline
125 Member, cause Brando says so :p
FRC #0125 (NUTRONS)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 343
Kim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond reputeKim Masi has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kim Masi
Re: Driving control scheme?

clearly, a dance dance revolution pad is the way to go as to how to control the robot. just kidding I don't think FIRST would approve...

seriously though, when I was the base driver last year, our team experimented with both the one stick and the two stick drive.

I prefer the two stick drive because it allows for versatility and it is easy to make small adjustments. Also, the two stick system allows me to rotate on a dime and on the fly. It is easy to maneuver.
__________________
Bobcat Robotics-Team 177: 2004-2007
The NUTRONS-Team 125: 2008-2009, 2011-2012ish
Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2006, 15:21
pyroslev's Avatar
pyroslev pyroslev is offline
VirginiaFIRST FTA
AKA: Jack of all trades, Master of few
no team (Forget not 616)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 414
pyroslev is on a distinguished road
Re: Driving control scheme?

I recall (My brain's fired from a Bio Test) one year the toggle box with all the controls had two key switches:

1. Changed the direction of the tank drive. Forward was backwards and vice versa to allow quick controls
2. Switched between 1 joystick control for movement and tank drive.

Whether or not they were helped I don't remember but the First switch got a few nods for use that year (Zone Zeal)
__________________
"Complications arose, ensued...were overcome." "I'd trade 500 CNC machines for one good hearted student."


From December to April, since 2002, I forfeit my mental sanity for perfect insanity.
Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2006, 23:59
Vaillancourt88's Avatar
Vaillancourt88 Vaillancourt88 is offline
Team Scapegoat
AKA: Mr. V.
FRC #1602 (Cougarbots)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 16
Vaillancourt88 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Driving control scheme?

We were thinking about a neural interface, but decided against it just in case our driver has undiagnosed ADD:

OK, drive forward, turn 20 degrees right....ooh! look at that pretty girl in the stands...LOOK OUT!!!
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-02-2006, 00:42
angelofsumthin angelofsumthin is offline
One of those daisy men...
AKA: the one they call 'angel'
None #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 28
angelofsumthin will become famous soon enough
Re: Driving control scheme?

well, the total control of tank drive can be simulated using a good programmer who can give you diagonals and tolerance levels so like if u push foward and then a little to the left, it'll just slightly bend left
~D
__________________
[center]"Only Real Men Wear Daisys"

DAISY
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-02-2006, 00:46
ForgottenSalad's Avatar
ForgottenSalad ForgottenSalad is offline
In search of a home...
AKA: Michael Wessler
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Bethlehem, NH
Posts: 136
ForgottenSalad will become famous soon enoughForgottenSalad will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to ForgottenSalad
Re: Driving control scheme?

As far as between tank drive and one stick drive, I find tank drive much easier to use. One thing that I would really like to try is thumbsticks (maybe time to pick up an old analog gamepad...) and have the left stick as the forward and backwards, and the right stick as the left and right.
Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-02-2006, 01:04
Tureyhall Tureyhall is offline
Registered User
AKA: Thomas Hall
FRC #0668 (Apes Of Wrath)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: San Jose
Posts: 40
Tureyhall will become famous soon enoughTureyhall will become famous soon enough
Re: Driving control scheme?

we actually HAVE to use two-joystick drive so that we can program in all the driving "extras" we need for this year's competition. It'd be too hard to program them in with 1 joystick drive. plus our drivers are used to tank drive (drivers are all juniors)....
__________________
/*Nerd Camouflage*/

2005 SVR - 668+1072+840 - Semifinalists.
2006 SVR - 668+1280+1693 - Finalists.
2007 SVR - 668+604+624 - Quarter-finalists, Xerox Creativity Award, two highest scores (290-2, 128-0) at SVR.
2007 Nat's - TBA.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Concept of PID explained ConKbot of Doom Technical Discussion 11 27-01-2008 00:11
Control Scheme Drok00 Control System 5 19-01-2006 16:57
Best Driving scheme? Issues Programming 6 16-11-2005 15:53
2005 RadioShack Innovation In Control Award--What Won? Billfred Control System 8 12-06-2005 01:51
How did you control your Robot? 1? 2? Wheel? How? ChrisCook Control System 9 17-05-2005 21:41


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:43.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi