|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Has this affected your design? | |||
| Yes |
|
33 | 30.28% |
| No |
|
76 | 69.72% |
| Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New rule Clarification changes plans
Guys, reread the first Q&A.
That device would not be a legal shooter . That means you cannot shoot balls rapidly out of it. If you're not, you can still extend outside the 28x38 (or whatever) starting bounds. So, your shouldn't have to redesign that much. Just lower the speed of your mechanism. I think FIRST needs to define a minimum velocity that defines a device as a shooter. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [OCCRA]: Rule Clarification | Viking(redneck) | OCCRA | 3 | 24-11-2004 09:41 |
| Rule Changes at off season competitions | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 23 | 11-05-2004 22:39 |
| Very Important Rule Clarification!!! | Mr. Mac | OCCRA | 0 | 17-10-2002 23:35 |
| IMPORTANT RULE ADDITION AND CLARIFICATION | Mike McIntyre | OCCRA | 0 | 03-12-2001 22:17 |