Go to Post ... Better to treat everything like it's about to explode and be wrong than the other way round. - Bongle [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Would you rather have a nice looking robot or a winning robot?
Quality Robot 53 32.52%
Winning Robot 110 67.48%
Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2006, 13:19
Steve Howland Steve Howland is offline
Many years, many teams
FRC #2473 (Goldstrikers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 763
Steve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond reputeSteve Howland has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning Robot or Quality Robot?

I read the question as though a winning robot means that it doesn't need to really do anything particularly well, as long as it got the gold. With this in mind, the choice was simple.

Quality, hands down. A winning robot does not mean a good robot, and especially with this year's alliance selections, some lower-quality robots will end up in the winner's circle.

I see two scenarios:

In the first, you have the scrappy robot that got picked by the 1 and 2 seed alliance, and though you scored 5 points throughout eliminations your partners carried you through easily. This team's robot will be seen as the one that got a lucky break and snuck by on someone else's win. If this happened to my team and I overheard a comment such as this, I would be crushed.

The second scenario is the high-quality robot that happens to lose. Maybe an alliance partner broke, there was an unlucky call, or a driver did the wrong thing. As a quality robot you probably reached eliminations, and perhaps you were the captain of your alliance. Everyone sees you lose and thinks of you as a great robot that almost made it, and certainly a team to keep in mind for the future. People compliment you on your design and you see that although you didn't make it all the way, you had a killer robot. FIRST has always tried to teach us that winning is not the ultimate goal; what you take away from a competition should be more than just a trophy (even if you didn't get one!).

Of course a high-quality robot that rocks the competition would be great too, but, given the choices, I would not sacrifice quality for gold.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beatty's 2004 Robot mzitz2k General Forum 81 26-03-2004 15:18
Metro teens put robot to test Brandon Martus FIRST In the News... 1 24-03-2004 17:06
Controlling a FIRST robot with a Lego RCX Controller? archiver 2001 5 24-06-2002 04:19
Righting a robot... archiver 2001 2 24-06-2002 00:26
about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? Ken Leung Technical Discussion 12 26-11-2001 09:39


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi