|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Ok,
So if I'm the blue alliance, and there is one or more of the three "redabots" on top of MY platform (the one closest to my blue driver stations), then my blue alliance gets points even if my own three bluebots don't get onto the platform; correct? Therefore, It make sense to defend (but not pin) any redabots on the blue platform at the end of the match. Just because I can't climb and be king of my own (blue) hill doesn't mean that I'm about to let any redabot "stragglers" from getting down off of my hill; correct? Just don't pin them up onto your platform. You can "touch" the redabot on the blue platform and that redabot still counts for the blue alliance. I guess it begs the question of why any alliance would want to park any of their bots on top of YOUR platform? |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Good catch by Gary,
so it is indeed legal to "pin" and contain any robot while it is on the platform. It's only illegal ti "pin" while both robots are on the carpeted field (per <G24>) So, if your the blue alliance and any one of the redabots is on YOUR platform (the one closest to your blue driving station) then it coulds as 5 points for YOUR blue alliance as long as you can hold them up on the platform. Hmmmm, I think that their ability of charging DOWN the ramp is stronger than your bluebot ability to keep them up on the platform..... |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
actually, I can allready imagine the top bot just flipping over because he runs into the buttom bot...especially if they ram into eachother
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
are you sure it's not 5sec? I would check the PDF's but my pc is going a bit slow
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
I don't care how desperate you are, never tip another robot intentionally. Never.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
I never said I WOULD use it, it's just a brainstorm I had and decided to share with you guys
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
lol, i got pwned! see what happens when you skim the rules? I mistook "either" for "their"
|
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
I suppose that I should add that the refs do track things that skim close to the rules involving ramming and tipping. If a team gets close, they get warned and a note made of that warning. If they do it again, they are under closer watch and are more likely to get themselves hit with a penalty.
Wetzel |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
that's interesting, but backing off 3ft? how am I supposed to know how much is that?
|
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Quote:
Really, robots are a max of 38 inches (unexpanded) right? So just back off one robot length. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: an evil, desperate, ramp strategy
Quote:
gonna call it as 'backing up enough for the other robot to have a chance at getting away) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ramp Scoring, At 00:00 or After? | Rombus | Rules/Strategy | 21 | 02-05-2006 05:02 PM |
| To ramp, or not to ramp? | phrontist | Rules/Strategy | 27 | 01-26-2006 05:56 PM |
| Ramp Riot 2004: Call for Comments | OZ_341 | Off-Season Events | 4 | 11-28-2004 02:53 PM |
| Technical question about ramp balancing | archiver | 2001 | 5 | 06-23-2002 10:29 PM |
| Evil, Evil, Evil, Evil, Evil, and one more for Chewie's sake, eeeeevil... | Robby O | Chit-Chat | 35 | 08-17-2001 04:12 PM |