|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Backwards motor
Be careful with that method, if you push the sticks full forward you (theoretically) get 254, adding anything more than 1 to that will cause it to wrap around to 0 and trigger a high speed reversal, that'll make driving kind of difficult.
You could put a software cap that limits joystick input to 254 - bias, whatever it ends up being, then the slower motor will reach full speed and the faster one won't, but that isn't perfect either. A percentage based bias adjustment, plus a sanity check to prevent wrap around would be a good solution. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Backwards motor
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Backwards motor
Quote:
prolly'll make a less symetrical robot, distributing the weight unevenly leading to left right bias anyways.. with the CIMs. i wouldnt bother. now if we were gonna use those drill motors again... then id try to match the motor rotation... easier than close looping. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low Cost Planetary Gearbox Source... | Joe Johnson | Motors | 32 | 14-11-2006 18:02 |
| Inductance of CIMs | phrontist | Electrical | 13 | 06-01-2006 09:17 |
| Cheap Torque Measurement? | ChuckDickerson | Motors | 15 | 13-06-2005 13:57 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Important Fisher-Price motor and gearbox information | sanddrag | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 11-02-2005 18:19 |
| DC motor design project | Ian Mackenzie | Motors | 0 | 29-01-2005 13:30 |