|
Re: Engineering Inspiration Award
I think the real question is, what is the difference between the criteria for each award? The general differences are relatively obvious, but the criteria differences are not. Criteria that you have for Chairmans may also help you win E.I, but criteria you have for E.I. may also help you win Chairmans. So what are the judges guided to look for in an E.I. winner that is different than what they'd look for in C.A winner? (besides the fact you submit something for C.A.)
Our team won E.I. last year at Midwest, and while I know reasons why they would choose our team for E.I., they are the same reasons I'd think we could be chosen for C.A. someday. What sets apart E.I. from C.A?
Also looking to see if there's any good explanation as to why E.I. shouldn't be called "runner-up" to C.A.
__________________
Co-Chair Boilermaker Regional Planning Committee 2004-2011
2008 St. Louis Regional Finalists and Engineering Inspiration Award
2007 St. Louis Regional Champions - Thanks 1444 & 829! / St. Louis and Boilermaker Quality Award
2006 Boilermaker Chairman's Award
Referee - IRI - 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
2005 Midwest Regional - Semifinalist, Engineering Inspiration Award, and Safety Award / Boilermaker Regional - Judges Award
2004 Midwest Regional Champions - Thanks 269 and 930! / IRI Runner-Up - Thanks to 234 and 447!!!
2004 Championship: Archimedes Finalist - Thanks 716 and 1272!
"We are going to be praised and criticized more than we deserve. We are not to be affected by either." ~ co-worker
|
if you put 3 controls engineers in a room you will get 4 different way to do tuning. - FrankJ [more] 
19-02-2006, 16:39
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode