|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
I think you should rename those divisions to
IRI Curie Galileo Newton |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Ive made the corrections to the list on the first page
980s back in Archimedes ![]() |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
As long as you've left out 492, your list is wrong.
![]() |
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
I just looked at the list of registered teams for the event. How do you check which division you're in? or did you just take them in numerical order and sort them?
|
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Divisions aren't officially released till the week before Atlanta. But this sorting is the way that it has been done for the past couple years.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
Yeah...in the revision archemedes is absolutely stacked...the original divisions were pretty even, but i'd give the toughest nod to newton...i hope they randomize it, but I know they won't
|
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
What if they randomize it within each block of 100 team numbers? Put teams 1-100 in a "box" and "draw" them out. Then do the same for 101-200, 201-300, etc. It could easily be computerized.
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
archmeides was stacked, the division championships would be tougher than Einstein.
What if it worked out like A C G N 1 9 16 22 4 11 20 25 27 38 45 48 33 40 47 49 59 65 67 70 60 66 69 71 74 85 87 93 79 86 88 108 ect. ect. Basically 2 teams go to Archimedes, then 2 to Curie, then 2 to Galileo and then 2 to Newton. This way you'd get to see some teams that are side by side without completely stacking the competition like Karthik. (notice how he had all the Niagra FIRST teams in the same division) Last edited by Conor Ryan : 27-02-2006 at 09:47. |
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Championship Divisions
So here's the divisions before the week 1 regionals begin.
230 teams 1 4 9 11 16 20 22 25 27 33 38 40 45 47 48 49 59 60 65 66 67 69 70 71 74 79 85 86 87 88 93 100 108 111 118 120 121 122 125 126 128 135 138 148 151 155 159 166 168 173 174 175 176 179 180 190 191 192 195 201 203 204 207 211 217 223 224 226 228 231 233 234 236 237 247 254 269 279 292 295 302 304 308 312 322 326 330 337 340 341 343 345 346 348 357 358 359 365 371 375 378 386 395 397 401 405 406 418 435 440 444 447 461 462 468 469 476 486 494 499 503 519 525 527 540 546 555 563 573 585 610 614 618 647 650 662 665 686 714 716 752 768 803 809 815 816 830 836 842 846 862 868 869 888 896 900 922 928 945 967 971 973 980 989 999 1002 1014 1023 1024 1033 1038 1057 1089 1102 1103 1114 1126 1138 1187 1188 1250 1251 1262 1272 1280 1289 1302 1323 1324 1350 1366 1367 1368 1379 1394 1402 1403 1422 1425 1446 1448 1450 1452 1481 1482 1492 1502 1503 1506 1507 1508 1511 1523 1538 1541 1549 1560 1563 1567 1592 1595 1604 1616 1617 1626 1646 1654 1675 1680 1685 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Success of the #1 Seeds at the Championship Event | Karthik | Championship Event | 7 | 23-07-2004 02:09 |
| White Paper Discuss: Championship 20004 results for all divisions | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 1 | 23-04-2004 02:05 |
| Championship Divisions? | Ken Loyd | General Forum | 0 | 21-03-2004 21:53 |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Championship Qualification - Constructive Criticism | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 7 | 29-10-2003 16:48 |