|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
The state of preparation of the low seeds, being rather bad as it seemed at VCU, is a completely sepearate issue fromt he new ranking system.
As much as I don't like the new system, I will admit it acheived what it was set out to, at least at VCU. It was meant to bring more competitive matchplay and a greater chance for the lower seeds to advance and win. The #2 and #3 alliances fell in the QFs, and the the #6 beat the #4 seed in the finals, it did what it was meant to do. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The top 8 teams will be....(2004) | Jessica Boucher | General Forum | 20 | 24-03-2004 22:31 |
| Changing the Elim. Format... | Joe Johnson | General Forum | 46 | 08-04-2003 12:27 |
| "Fixing" matches | Shawn60 | General Forum | 158 | 18-03-2003 18:41 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| The Society for More Qualifying Rounds | archiver | 1999 | 47 | 23-06-2002 22:05 |