|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
Quote:
Wetzel |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
This will be discussed in the Head Referee conference call as I don't believe the referees have any way of knowing if an E-stop button has been used. I'll report back on this issue after the call.
PLEASE NOTE though, that the head referee at the event makes the final call. It is always best to ask the question at the driver's meeting prior to the start of competition. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
Quote:
In any case, if you KNOW you wont be able to be righted, might as well hit the estop just to be sure. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I guess I would look at the e-stop/robot disabled from a slightly different point of view - If I were a team starting to play defence in the alliance zone with 3 robots and I did not want to get a penalty for having more than 2 operable robots on defence at any given time I would do my best to insure I took an action whereby the Head Ref would not have to ask him/her self "Are they Disabled?" and the answer should have been an immediate YES!
Now, what action could that be? 1. Hope the ref knows that since my robot is not upright it must be disabled - right? 2. Have my robot catch on fire/emit copious amounts of smoke and shutting down the match (used a couple of times at GLR) thereby avoiding a penalty or 3. Use the e-stop for my robot (not the alliance member on the right) and give a clear concise signal that my robot is disabled I would vote for #3 - #3 my lord ( oops sorry have Shrek on my mind).When taking this action the corresponding light over the team station starts to blink which among other things means that the robot is disabled. A riskier path to take is for the driver to assume that since the robot is not upright that must mean to the Head Ref that the robot is disabled. At GLR I saw a robot that was tipped over during auto and was the 3'rd robot when on defence. I gave the alliance a grace period to see if they would disable the robot and luckily for the alliance one of the running robots went to the other side of the field to wait. I said luckily because I did not know for sure if the robot was really disabled because when offense for this alliance was ran the robot righted itself and continued to play the game. If the team did not send a running robot over to the other side of the field I would have awarded offside points and would have been correct to do so especially when the robot joined in when offence was ran and thru it's actions was clearly NOT disabled. -Per last nights head ref discussion. If the team playing defence had not sent a running robot over to the other side of the field during defence and given that the "tipped over" was righted whe it was their turn for offfence they could have been awarded a 40 point offside penalty. Choose wisely grasshopper Last edited by Godzilla! : 15-03-2006 at 08:47. Reason: Head Ref Discussion |
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
Quote:
Yeah I believe that once the E-Stop is pushed down the light over that particular station should flash 2 or 3 times then repeat to let field control the E-Stop is down - Field Control will also see that the E-stop is down via the scoring system which has a special line that shows the E-Stop Status. Fill free to correct me if I'm wrong, I know the scoring system has that function I just don't remember how many times the light flashes to signal the E-Stop is down. |
|
#21
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
A VERY safe way to show that you have no control of your robot is to have the entire drive team hold their hands up in the air.
We lost control of our robot in a match (it wasnt hurting anyone, though it shoved another robot into the corner even though we were trying to back off) because it never came out of autonomous. Our drivers didnt think of hitting the estop, but they threw their hands up in the air after trying to back away unsuccessfully, and were NOT called for pinning because they did not have control. Per update 15 if a robot has NO way to right itself, you do not need a backbot. The intention is that you only have 2 robots running interference, theoretically so that one robot can score at all times. |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
The light blinks constantly, just like it does before you connect a control system and have communication with your robot. And E-Stops can't be undone. After scoring the 2000 game and constantly running about resetting E-Stops, I'm just a bit familiar with how they work.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Attention tipped over robots! Please use the e-stop button.
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by DjAlamose : 14-03-2006 at 14:56. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 CMUcam2 Code | Kevin Watson | Programming | 81 | 10-02-2007 20:17 |
| Tipping and Tipped robots | Brandon Holley | General Forum | 11 | 18-01-2005 13:06 |
| Driving Robots under/into the Goals ... allowed? | erniep | Rules/Strategy | 8 | 11-01-2005 22:32 |
| FYI: FIRST Robots at the NYC Hall of Science | Rich Wong | General Forum | 9 | 11-07-2002 10:52 |
| A Real BALANCING Act !? | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 23-06-2002 22:35 |