|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
Defense may be necessary to test the strenght and capabilities of your robot as well as giving the driver some defense practice. However, there is no reason for this to be excessive...maybe 10 seconds or so. Most robots need practice scoring therefor it shouldn't matter which goal you try for either just as long as you can practice getting the balls in the goals.
So I basically agree that defensive shouldn't the main focus of practice rounds and robots should be allowed to score. Actually why not leave the lights on all the time (other than for field testing) to maximize a teams chance to practice scoring? |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
I really don't like robots defending other robots on practice day. The other robots are mostly barely moving and not really trying all out to score a bazillion points and win a game anyways. What's the point of practicing against a robot that's not even trying? What's so professional about risking breaking an opponent's robot before they get to play one official match?
Personally, if I have to deal with robots trying to "practice" running into my robot, I'd just as soon take my robot to the practice field where everyone is trying to be productive and get robots working and tested. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
You design a robot that can score but is not very strong.
I design a robot that cant score much but can push anyone. You want to practice getting on the ramp. I want to practice getting you up the ramp. Both teams are testing their strategy. I see nothing wrong with defense on practice day. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
With most of the past games I've seen I would agree that Practice day should be for practicing scoring, BUT this year we are not only allowed to play defense in the game, theres a whole 40 second period of the game where your alliance is on DEFENSE. Its a major part of this years game so you should practice it.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
From the tournament manual.
Quote:
Seriously though, should we make an field announcement, say at a drivers meeting prior to the start of practice rounds? On a second practice related topic. Should we allow team extra practices on a standby basis, if another team does not show? |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
If a team is playing defense in the practice rounds and they see that a robot is breaking, on their alliance or not, they should have the common sense to make an effort NOT to hit that robot.
I do agree that if a team needs to test a part of their robot and they request not to be hit that match, teams should not hit them. Remember, that team could be on you alliance in qualifying matches. If that team isn't allowed to test their robot, they might not be as effective of an alliance partner as they could be. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
Defense during the practice rounds at BAE was fairly significant, we were actually flipped during one and one of our friends, Team Discovery, had a gearbox broken from being rammed by an oppenent.
The more practice time teams have to get "dialed in" on thursday means for better competition friday and saturday. If they spend all day thursday in the pits fixing stuff that's broken during practice rounds they may never be able to compete up to their full potential when it counts. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
Quote:
Assume I've got the defendingest robot in the competition and you've got a shooter, defender, whatever. Would you appreciate it if I spent 10 minutes defending your robot up onto the ramp and pinning it there? Would you like it if in the process of defending you, I accidentally knocked your robot over? You don't particularly need another robot around to practice defending against. Pushing things is not as hard as you seem to think, just practice driving and you'll be plenty prepared for defending. Failing that, if you really really want to defend someone, then seek out one of the teams on the field and ask them if you can practice against them for a while. An offensive team with all their bugs worked out will probably want to practice shooting and maneuvering against defense. Much, much better to ask permission than to ask forgiveness for annoying a team that's simply trying to get a robot working. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is defense necessary in practice rounds?
I've always heard how you practice is how you play, but you should still keep it within reason. If your bot is a defensive bot then yes practice defending the goal then when you are sure that you can (10-20 seconds) go do something else, remember let the other team practice too.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is allowing a practice robot good for FIRST? | Matt Adams | General Forum | 38 | 19-01-2005 11:35 |
| Practice Rounds = First Four Rounds...any qualms? | Jessica Boucher | Regional Competitions | 9 | 21-03-2004 20:24 |
| Spectators allowed during practice rounds? | Brian(1) | Regional Competitions | 2 | 01-03-2004 22:59 |
| 2004 Practice Rounds | Francis-134 | General Forum | 1 | 28-02-2004 15:00 |
| 4 practice rounds | Madison | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 08-01-2002 00:01 |