|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was wondering if there was much difference between the experience levels at different regional tournaments. Using team number as an indicator of team age (and therefore institutional experience) I calculated the average team number for every regional this year. I also calculated the standard deviation, but it turned out to be similar across all regionals so I did not include it (it turns out that the data doesn't bunch up very much).
Regional Average PHILADELPHIA 640 BAE 729 UTC 754 GLR 776 DETROIT 789 W MICHIGAN 834 BUCKEYE 859 PITTSBURGH 864 LONG ISLAND 883 NJ 919 VCU 941 SVR 948 PALMETTO 952 NYC 961 FLORIDA 982 FINGER LAKES 998 MIDWEST 1028 CHESAPEAKE 1036 DAVIS 1054 TORONTO 1060 BOSTON 1073 SO CAL 1074 BOILERMAKER 1077 WISCONSIN 1089 ARIZONA 1106 WATERLOO 1106 LAS VEGAS 1142 PNW 1183 LONE STAR 1192 PEACHTREE 1285 ST. LOUIS 1337 DENVER 1420 ISRAEL 1813 Not surprisingly, Israel is the "youngest" regional, while Denver is the "youngest" North American regional. I don't know what this means, but I thought you all might find it interesting. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Regional Team Experience Level
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Regional Team Experience Level
interesting data.
there are a few low numbered teams whose number does not represent their age - there were some numbers recycled before switching to the latest system of new team = new number. I don't know where you can get the info, but it could have an influence - |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Regional Team Experience Level
Quote:
). |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Regional Team Experience Level
I'm pretty sure Team 4 is a 2004 Rookie team, which could really throw the calculations off for their regionals. If you've got time could you crunch the data for the Championships as a whole and the divisions?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Regional Team Experience Level
I agree with the stats for the Chesapeake regional. With 15 rookie teams out of 64 attending, and seeing the preparedness of the rookies at this event, I can see your calculation making perfect sense.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Regional Team Experience Level
Quote:
Philly probably would register 50-60 if space would allow. Much like the Mid-Atlantic (New Jersey) Regional at Rutgers, it just needs a bigger venue (and it may get it with an old Coast Guard Armory). My team has made Philly their home regional and attended it ever since our rookie year (2000 - 7 years). I've been going there so long I know the most of the team names by number. We are also happy to have some "very experienced" New England friends visiting us, 157 The Aztechs (Won it in 2002), 173 Rage (I bet Jeff had a say in that decision), 177 Bobcats (Won it in 2004). It should be a very competitive regional. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Death of FIRST | Anton Abaya | General Forum | 23 | 03-05-2006 17:18 |
| How do you organize your team? | NoodleKnight | Team Organization | 18 | 03-11-2005 22:57 |
| How many regionals is your team attending? | Lil_moe | General Forum | 35 | 16-09-2005 20:25 |
| Philly Regional and had to you kept your FIRST team a TEAM | Freddy Schurr | Regional Competitions | 3 | 28-03-2005 07:29 |
| FIRST was an awesome experience for our rookie team (team overview) | TheGreatPF | General Forum | 6 | 05-04-2004 00:15 |