|
|
|
 Not only would it be cool but the mental image of Dave's suffering when he writes a message in unintelligible characters makes me grin uncontrollably. - Andrew Schreiber [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New Aliance Selection?
I asked Woodie about this at UTC. His thoughts are that it would be unfair to deny the top teams their #1 picks. If a team is the #1 seed, they deserve to form the best alliance they can, same with #2-#8. It would be unfair to the top 8 teams to force them to pick teams outside of the top 8.
It's an interesting debate with strong arguments from both sides. The reverse-order for second round seems to be leveling the playing field a bit though. 
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New alliance selection method | Bharat Nain | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 08-01-2006 22:16 |
| [OCCRA]: CMP Alliance Selection | Alex Golec | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 14-11-2005 18:20 |
| Alliance Selection 2005- Like it? | OneAngryDaisy | Rules/Strategy | 42 | 14-03-2005 14:59 |
| Team Selection Process??? | tribotec_ca88 | Team Organization | 18 | 14-10-2004 15:55 |
| need help double checking motor selection lecture notes | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 5 | 16-12-2002 00:05 |
Hybrid Mode
