|
|
|
 You are not allowed to think outside of the box, but you are allowed to think diagonally in the box. - eugenebrooks [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| You are not allowed to think outside of the box, but you are allowed to think diagonally in the box. - eugenebrooks [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#12
20-03-2006, 16:24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New Aliance Selection?
NASA/VCU Regional:
#1 seeded 1731 picks #2 seeded 414, and loses in the semi-finals. Arizona Regional: #1 seeded 987 picks #6 seeded 1241 and loses in the finals. Great Lakes Regional: #1 seeded 469 picks #6 seeded 451 and loses in the finals. 3 more instances of when #1 seeds picked top 8 seeds and lost. The top alliances already have huge penelizations by the serpentine selection system, they deserve no more. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New alliance selection method | Bharat Nain | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 08-01-2006 22:16 |
| [OCCRA]: CMP Alliance Selection | Alex Golec | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 14-11-2005 18:20 |
| Alliance Selection 2005- Like it? | OneAngryDaisy | Rules/Strategy | 42 | 14-03-2005 14:59 |
| Team Selection Process??? | tribotec_ca88 | Team Organization | 18 | 14-10-2004 15:55 |
| need help double checking motor selection lecture notes | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 5 | 16-12-2002 00:05 |
Threaded Mode