|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New Aliance Selection?
I personally like this year's change in picking order. Scouting becomes much more important to the number one seed. I'd know; our second round pick at Chesapeake, 1184, was seeded 39th (I think); as coach, I had never seen them play, but our scouts (as well as Buzz's once they spoke to our alliance captain) swore they were a good robot who had some bad luck. They were right. We (the number one seed) picked the 3rd seed, who declined, and then the 4th seed (Buzz), but then picked a lower seeded team. It worked out very well for us.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New alliance selection method | Bharat Nain | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 08-01-2006 22:16 |
| [OCCRA]: CMP Alliance Selection | Alex Golec | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 14-11-2005 18:20 |
| Alliance Selection 2005- Like it? | OneAngryDaisy | Rules/Strategy | 42 | 14-03-2005 14:59 |
| Team Selection Process??? | tribotec_ca88 | Team Organization | 18 | 14-10-2004 15:55 |
| need help double checking motor selection lecture notes | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 5 | 16-12-2002 00:05 |