Who are the better shooters?

[Kyle Love]

Don't forget about 1024 or 1038. 1024 has amazing automodes and uses the camera very well.

[Koko Ed]

Nothing compares to 25.
Sparx and DIvision by Zero were the best at FLR (think mass quanities) but 25 is deadly accurate even when pushed ( you need to actually spin them around to make them miss).

[Arefin Bari]

Team 25 and Team 86.

Wait, just saw team 254 in action. Gotta add them to the list.

[Jaine Perotti]

At the UTC New England regional, my top shooting picks were:

126
20
237
177

All of these robots performed beautifully, and I believe all of them could score well in autonomous mode.

[Travis Hoffman]

Originally Posted by Koko Ed

Nothing compares to 25.
Sparx and DIvision by Zero were the best at FLR (think mass quanities) but 25 is deadly accurate even when pushed ( you need to actually spin them around to make them miss).

or get between them and the goal and block all their shots.....

Pushing camera-driven turreted shooters from the side is like trying to kill an elephant with a toothpick. Even if you do manage to dislodge them from their position, it most likely won't be enough to stop them to any great degree.

GET IN FRONT OF PEOPLE! Especially robots with low-mounted launchers.

As a wise man once said in a great movie....

"Get in front of the d@*! ball!!! Don't give me this OLE' bs!"



Once they dialed in their camera and turret, 494 was quite effective at the Buckeye Regional.