|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Hey everyone. 1468 here to clear up what happened in the finals.
By Match 3 it was tied up 1-1 each. That round ended in a tie wich led to Match 4. When Match 4 began the Blue Alliance dumped 10 balls in the goal and the Red Alliance shot 2 balls in the upper goal. However, even though Blue won autonomous, the computer gave the Auto. win to Red. Because of that, it went to Match 5, which Blue lost. On a side note, during Match 4 Hauppauge's robot went through the lower goal. Unfortunatley, we didn't realize about calling it until after we called the autonomous error and started Match 5. If we called the lower goal immediatley, we could've DQ'ed the entire Red Alliance and won. And on another side note, if anyone noticed, during the semi-finals, we switched our human player. I was the original human player, but right before Match 2 of the semi-finals, I sprained my back loading 329's robot with balls, and had to subtittute with one of our mechanics. Not that I'm complaining, but he threw with the light off, which may be one reason why we tied in Match 3 of the finals. To all teams going to Georgia, good luck, god speed, and have fun representing Long Island. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
We saw that Hauppauge's robot had passed through the bottom goal during Match 4 by more than 3 inches.
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
I believe that Greg was actually trying to allude to the goal incursion issue. I know (from personal experience with him) that he realizes that a team cannot call a DQ on their opponents. Any and all penalties given are done by the referees and the ref's at the SBPLI regional did quite a good job. There were a minimum of issues with the officiating. I feel that they did a good job despite being put in some tenous positions as a result of circumstances.
The main problems revolved around the field, scoring and seeding programs throughout the weekend. There were endless issues with qualifying match scheduling, lack of (read NO) seeding information until, literally 5 min before alliance selection and more "re-do's" than I have ever seen at any regional. Not to mention the fact that the top 8 seeds had to be "adjusted" after alliance selections had begun because a qualifying match had not been included in the original scoring tally and a team that should have been in the top 8 had been left out. Thankfully it did not affect the teams that had already selected but it did cause quite a bit of confusion at the event as virtually everyone including the selecting alliances were unaware of what was happening. That being said...... Greg's team had a tremendous day establishing a new high water mark for the 1468 J-Birds and I know he's a trifle bit dissapointed at not winning a regional. However being a regional finalist is something to be content with for now as well as an incentive to bring your team's involvement and dedication up to the next level for the future. The alliance of team 358, 271 & 870 did very, very well and they definitely knew that their opposing alliance of 1468, 353, 329 was there making them earn it all the way. While I am not personally familiar with the folks on 870 I do know that they are unique in this locale for the community support they have been able to cultivate. I can tell you that Scott and Marc on 358 are excellent mentors and 358 should be proud that they have these folks in their corner. Team 271 and the "Bad Boyz" from Bay Shore also have excellent support from their mentors and community along with good teachers like Mr. Cavanaugh. Oh and Greg **cough, cough** Hauppauge (team 358) could not have possibly had an incursion into the goal as they don't dump into the corner goals, gotta love our scouting team and their depth of information for that one! ![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Quote:
On a more important topic.... I want to send a big congrats to 514 for Chairmans, and to Pat for Woody Flowers. You guys are a class act!!!!!!!!!! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Clarification on the positioning thing, my Dad is bad with details so Madison was misinformed.
He was confusing the time we made a last minute change to our alignment, which we verified was ok with the head ref before doing so, with the fact that for match 5 we broke our position trend and let 271 take slot 1 and we took 2, no rule breaking here, just a confused Dad ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Can you clear up when my team went into a corner goal? I drive the robot and there was only 1 time I was anywhere remotely near a corner and that was to collect some balls with my conveyor, not push balls in or dump balls out.
Congrats to all who put up with going through a 5 match best of 3 finals competition. I had a great time and I hope to see you all and Championships. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Well like I said, I don't have all of the specifics since I was in a world of hurt and cheering at the same time.
Brain, could you clear up what actually happened with that. Being half-there and listening on several conversations at once, I obviously missed something with that. I'm sorry Hauppauge if its looks like I'm trying to knock you, I'm just trying to relay everything I knew in the hopes it gets corrected. This is why I really wish they would check their own video feeds for things like this... |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
OK Greg, to help clarify:
With all the excitement of the replays, replays & uh....oh yeah replays of the final match there was some misinformation flowing around. 1. There was no actual goal incursion by any team on any alliance. Matt (not Krass our teams Matt C.) verified that afterwards with the refs due to the confusion. The ONLY issues during the replays were field/computer related, (oh yeah and that tie score in the 3rd match) 2. As I mentioned earlier 358 did not have ANY mechanism on their robot that would allow them to enter the lower goal in any way, shape or form. We saw that in Hartford and also knew from our scouting info that dumping was not part of their strategy. Quite frankly they didn't need to dump 'cause their shooter is excellent and only getting better as they "massage" their technology. On a side note I want to echo Scott's congrats to 514 for their chairman's award. They have been around for many years and through all their up's and down's have always been a class act when it comes to Gracious Professionalism. Greg, remember that the competition is only a means to and end and the robot is the method of getting to that end. The real payoff is having people like yourself, Matt Krass and anyone else on any FIRST team anywhere having the opportunity to do this. Like I kept telling all of your 1468 team mates during the build period: "If you're not careful you're actually going to learn something from this and then you'll be addicted like the rest of us." |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Hey, Good playing guys, we played really good as a team. Im a pit crew guy from 870, but we did really well together. Congrats too all
Wow, our team went from dead last for most of friday into saturday , to winning the finals. you guys made a good pick.GO 870!!! ![]() Last edited by wt200999 : 26-03-2006 at 09:09. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Congrats to 358 on a successful defense of their regional championship! I understand that makes four straight regional finals appearances for you, and, if only in my book, three regional championships in two years. Good luck in Atlanta; I won't be there but my team might. If we are, feel free to drop by our pit and say hello.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Thanks sw293
Spike is one of our all time favorite teams. We appreciate you taking us to the finals in Philly last yr. By the way your robot looked great in NJ this year. I liked the antenna springs that opened your basket/hopper. Ken |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 SBPLI Long Island Regional
Congratulations to 514 for winning Chairman's Award, and thanks to 329, 353 and 1468 for an intense Finals. Thanks to 271 and 870 for being with us at the end.
Also congratulations to all the MVPs chosen by their teams.and to echo others - third match was a tie, fourth match was replayed because we lost autonomous mode, the computer said we won. So a field mishap created the fifth match. Quote:
358, first seed (11-1-0), picked 271 as our first pick then 870 as our second pick.Quote:
Also our shooter never actaully broke - it was just jammed and had positioning problems from a slipping potentiometer. Its a good thing it ended when it did - we were starting to run low on batteries! ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 Manuals | CronosPrime1 | Programming | 0 | 29-01-2006 15:32 |
| Threads getting too long to make sense of | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 22 | 05-05-2005 01:14 |
| White Paper Discuss: 296's CORDIC Math Library | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 5 | 28-04-2004 20:01 |
| 4 Hangers at SBPLI Long Island Regional | edflyerssn007 | Robot Showcase | 7 | 25-03-2004 23:13 |
| How long should production time be??? | archiver | 1999 | 4 | 23-06-2002 23:16 |