|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
We were 11th seed after the qualifying rounds at the New Jersey regional in Trenton. I was so sure that we were going to get picked, we had a fairly good shooter and we had plenty of torque to play defense. It was a good robot, but we didn't get picked.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
Quote:
At some regionals including the Wisconsin regional, there was the STAMP program available to all teams, so if you really did not want to do your own scouting, you did not have to. This was made available to all teams and all teams were told several times about it. FYI this is why it's important to listen to announcements from the pits and field reminding you to form a list. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
We were 16th or 17th at UTC, and did not get selected.. I think it is b/c we did so bad on fri and many teams may have already selected their choices.
We also had bad luck with teammates in qualifying as we had 2 games with partners missing or none at all... |
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
Kind of going on the opposite note of everyone here, we were ranked 43rd of 44 teams, and were picked. I would like to extend appreciation to scouts at the Boston Regional for looking at individual performance, rather than their ranking.
Our team was getting just the worst of luck with partners. If we had a solid looking team, one of the good members would end up flipping, or turning off in some freak accident, but our team was consistently scoring 25+ points a match, and that got us noticed. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
We were 12th, hoping to get picked. But we were disappointed.
Due to the rules of FIRST, we were to be on stand by just in case a team went down. I didn't think it would happen, but one of the robot chain or transmission broke down and we were now allianced with the 2 top seeded teams. But....we lost to the cheesypoofs ![]() |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
i know on my former team(MORT 11) and current(125 NUtrons) we try to concentrate on the robot as an individual. Yes there is that factor if they can/do work well with your alliance but in the end you want the best robot. At GSR we should have been ranked 19th but due to a scoring glitch we ended up in 30th and didn't get picked, granted we were not best but we had the best range(about 35ft) and could play defense. Then come Boston we had to face the #1 seed think pink 233 in 2 straight matches, in the first we played strong d and pushed them across the field. The second match they kept away from us to an extent. After the match they complimented us on playing great defense. We had could not catch a break with our alliances and were 1-8-1 and in 43rd out of 44. We ended up getting picked by the #2 seed, but(121 and 233) the first alliance was going to pick us if they #2 had not. This shows that the more veteran teams are more open to picking a robot with a lower rank if they have properly scouted. It seems that most rooks and younger teams in general have not yet realized the value of a good scouting team
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
103 was ranked 32 at the end of friday (due to technical problems that were resolved and the robot now runs smoothly) and 22 at the time of alliance selections. we were second pick of the afternoon, team 293 recognized our potential when everything was working right (they also saw us at NJ). in our case, the ranking didnt affect us because 293 scouted and saw a team that would work well with them.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
While a story from last, it's relevant to the topic, so I thought I'd share....
In 2005, Team 358 (who was a member of the winning alliance at the Long Island Regional, won Chairmans at the Long Island Regional, and was a member of a finalist alliance at the Philly Regional) seeded 14th in our division at Nationals, and did not get picked. Obviously this is not what it's all about, but it sure hurt at the time. At this point, we've turned the hurt into the motivation to take our destiny into our own hands. So far we've seeded 5th at UTC (and made it to the finals) and seeded 1 on Long Island (and won). We hope to control our own destiny in Atlanta. In the end, it's a great lesson that if you want to go to the dance, don't sit by the phone and wait, do what it takes to be in the position of doing the asking (which in this case meant working even harder than in the past)!!! |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest seeded team not picked for finals
Quote:
shaun |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Death of FIRST | Anton Abaya | General Forum | 23 | 03-05-2006 17:18 |
| East Coast Drivers Union | Corey Balint | FIRST-related Organizations | 153 | 10-04-2006 15:50 |
| Why do teams voluntarily do FIRST without adult technical mentors? | Andy Baker | General Forum | 127 | 05-12-2005 08:08 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Welcome 2005 FRC Championship Teams! | Andy Brockway | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 04-04-2005 16:33 |
| Robot Collaboration | Karthik | General Forum | 153 | 18-02-2004 03:40 |