Go to Post You know how grandmothers get shirts that say "Ask me about my grandchildren"? I want one that says "Ask me about my robotics team." - MissInformation [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2006, 23:25
ChuckDickerson's Avatar
ChuckDickerson ChuckDickerson is offline
Mentor / Bayou & CMP Division LRI
FRC #0456 (Siege Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vicksburg, MS
Posts: 877
ChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Concerning Whistleblowing

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
At SoCal I was an inspector. I saw a team using the plastic gearbox parts from the 2003 (and 2004?) kit of parts. These parts were custom made for FIRST back then, were not manufactured by the team during the build season, and were not COTS parts available to everyone by a legitamate vendor. I didn't inspect this particular robot but I saw it while passing by. I didn't call them on it because it would have ruined their whole shooter if they had to remove those pieces. It wasn't giving them any unfair advantage or presenting any unsafe condition.
I beg to differ. FRC is not completely fair, it isn't meant to be, and it never will be, however, all teams are given the exact same rules, exact same KoP, and the exact same challenge in an effort to make things as fair as possible across all teams. For a team to knowingly or inadvertently use ANY part that violates the rules, in this case an illegal gearbox from 2004, definitely IS giving them and unfair advantage over all of the other teams who either followed the rules or are newer teams who didn't have the 2004 gearbox available to use. If a team isn't following the rules it is not only unfair to the other teams but it is doing the team breaking the rules a disservice. If the team is KNOWINGLY breaking the rules then the mentors are truly doing the students a disservice by allowing it to continue and therefor rewarding cheating. If a team doesn't know they are breaking the rules then, well, they should have read ALL of the rules more closely like all of the other teams did that aren't breaking the rules. Either way, it is the duty of everyone (students, mentors, and inspectors) to uphold the rules as best as they can. If a team is observed breaking the rules they should be politely informed and given the benefit of the doubt and allowed to correct the problem. If they refuse they should not be allowed to compete until the situation is resolved. In this case, the team that used the 2004 gearbox should have read the rules like the rest of the teams that followed them. The shooter was illegal and should have been removed if it couldn't be redesigned to not use the illegal gearbox.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi