Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jack Jones
If what you say about Collaboration's intention of getting new teams up and running quickly, with a high level of capability, then why did you align yourselves against all of the rest at every event? Was it about building teams, or was it about compiling victories?
|
I think you should ask teams 33, 201, 67, 1901, 931, 1281, 1305, 1419, 1620, and 865 if the triplets did indeed "align (them)selves against all of the rest at every event".
Not to mention alliance partners from the qualifiers.
Not to mention all the other teams aided and inspired by Niagara First (mine included).
If 1114 was as antagonistic as you say, would they have won the Chairman's award in Waterloo?
The teams who have the best chance at success are the ones who know where they can save time and money on machining by using or using part of some premade equivalent.
- Bill Gold [more] 
08-04-2006, 10:39
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode