Go to Post It's cool when good things happen to good people. :) - Rich Kressly [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 00:43
sw293 sw293 is offline
Former Coach (2005)
AKA: Scott Weingart
FRC #0293 (SPIKE)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pennington, NJ
Posts: 123
sw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of light
2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Some of you noticed the CD-papers file I posted yesterday titled "Offensive Power Ratings 2006". The ratings are designed to give a rough estimate of the number of points a robot contributes to its alliance in a given match. A description of the system can be found here.

Now for a mea culpa: the ratings posted yesterday were incorrect, because I did a sloppy job writing the code for them (what else is new). This time around I let mathematica do the heavy lifting, with better results.

The new, corrected (I hope) ratings are posted here.

I will do this with each of the championships divisions Friday evening and will update them Saturday if I'm up to it. I am willing to do BAE, UTC, or GTR if someone will give me the match data for those regionals.
__________________
Team 293
Uncrowned Champions, 2005 Philadelphia Regional
Champions, 2007 Chesapeake Regional
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 01:03
Will Hanashiro Will Hanashiro is offline
GM/Kettering Mentor
FRC #0322 (F.I.R.E)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Flint, Michigan
Posts: 151
Will Hanashiro is just really niceWill Hanashiro is just really niceWill Hanashiro is just really niceWill Hanashiro is just really niceWill Hanashiro is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Will Hanashiro
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Very nice job. Kudos to you!

This is going to come in handy for scouting at the Championship Event. Thanks!
__________________

West Michigan Regional #1 Seed
2006 GLR Motorola Quality Award
2006 WMR GM Industrial Design Award

Kettering University ME Class of 2009
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 01:05
sw293 sw293 is offline
Former Coach (2005)
AKA: Scott Weingart
FRC #0293 (SPIKE)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pennington, NJ
Posts: 123
sw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

One issue with the FIRST scheduling algorithm: at Annapolis, a 64-team event, 1446 and 1218 were paired together twice. In smaller events including New York, Chicago, and Wisconsin, some teams were paired together in three different matches.

That said, I have no doubt that there are a couple mistakes in the ratings that I have made. In fact I know of one already: I duplicated half of the last match in VCU. (this will also be fixed later when I add SBPLI).

*edit: I just noticed that I duplicate the second half of the last match of a bunch of regionals.


Also, anyone who uses this or any other "objective" rating as a replacement for scouting is a fool. I didn't think I would have to say that.
__________________
Team 293
Uncrowned Champions, 2005 Philadelphia Regional
Champions, 2007 Chesapeake Regional

Last edited by sw293 : 09-04-2006 at 11:35.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 01:05
Rick TYler Rick TYler is offline
A VEX GUy WIth A STicky SHift KEy
VRC #0010 (Exothermic Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Redmond, Washington
Posts: 2,000
Rick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Very interesting.

Of course, it gives us the 12th highest power rating in our only regional, in which we didn't get picked for a finals alliance. The other interesting PNW outcome is that perennial regional powerhouse Titan Robotics had the highest power rating in the list, even though their finals alliance did not win. They just quietly keep getting it done.

Thanks for doing the math.

It would be interesting to find out the effect of experience on scores. Can you factor out the competition week (later weeks score more?) and experience (score more at second or third regional)?
__________________
Exothermic Robotics Club, Venturing Crew 2036
VRC 10A, 10B, 10D, 10Q, 10V, 10X, 10Z, and 575
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 01:22
sw293 sw293 is offline
Former Coach (2005)
AKA: Scott Weingart
FRC #0293 (SPIKE)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pennington, NJ
Posts: 123
sw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick TYler
Very interesting.

Of course, it gives us the 12th highest power rating in our only regional, in which we didn't get picked for a finals alliance. The other interesting PNW outcome is that perennial regional powerhouse Titan Robotics had the highest power rating in the list, even though their finals alliance did not win. They just quietly keep getting it done.

Thanks for doing the math.

It would be interesting to find out the effect of experience on scores. Can you factor out the competition week (later weeks score more?) and experience (score more at second or third regional)?
The power ratings are based on offensive scores alone, they do not take defense, week of competition or level of experience into account. I want to keep "arbitrariness" and subjectivity out of the calculation: that's why you scout. You can look at the effect of experience if you want to, because I rated each team independently at each regional. That's why, say, 25 has the 2nd and 5th highest ratings on the list (2nd for LV, 5th for NJ).

Note to anyone: The remaining mistakes are those that I made transcribing data from the website. If someone could post the number of matches played in qualification at each regional I could double-check my numbers, that would be great.
__________________
Team 293
Uncrowned Champions, 2005 Philadelphia Regional
Champions, 2007 Chesapeake Regional
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 02:40
eugenebrooks eugenebrooks is offline
Team Role: Engineer
AKA: Dr. Brooks
no team (WRRF)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 601
eugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Lets compare the offensive power ratings to actual per-team scoring data taken at PNW. The individual data was taken by a rotating team of six individuals, each of which kept an eye on a specific robot during each match.

Offensive power rating ; individual data ; rank if ind. data

492,PacificNW,28.1997745022847 ; 15.5 ; 7
360,PacificNW,24.6592693081115 ; 21.4 ; 3
1359,PacificNW,23.472463879954 ; 23.0 ; 2
1891,PacificNW,21.7517238635796 ; 16.1 ; 6
254,PacificNW,21.4957546988693 ; 13.5 ; 9
488,PacificNW,20.1777380169188 ; 24.9 ; 1
948,PacificNW,20.1649819298451 ; 18.1 ; 5
949,PacificNW,18.8042524648687 ; 11.7 ; 10

There is a correlation between good and poor scorers when considering the entire list, but the error in the ranking is as high as the number of alliances for the finals.

You would not want to use the power rating to do any picking if you are lucky enough to be picking in the nationals. Neither would you want to be using your own scoring from prior regionals as significant changes in performance can occur. You need to field a scoring team for your divison at the nationals. Doing a good job of that will serve you well...

Eugene

Last edited by eugenebrooks : 09-04-2006 at 02:43.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 03:10
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,795
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by sw293
Also a quick note on the scheduling algorithm FIRST uses at regionals: it stinks. Go to the match schedule for Pacific Northwest and count the number of qualification matches played by 254 and 1569. That's right, 254 played 11 matches and 1569 played 9 matches.
Everyone at Portland played at least 10 matches. We played 11, because there weren't enough teams who had played 9 matches to fill out the last qualifying match.

The last match didn't count at all for us, or the other 11 match teams at the event.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 09:04
Fred Sayre's Avatar
Fred Sayre Fred Sayre is offline
Registered User
AKA: Fred Sayre
FRC #0488 (xbot)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 141
Fred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Fred Sayre
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by eugenebrooks
Lets compare the offensive power ratings to actual per-team scoring data taken at PNW. The individual data was taken by a rotating team of six individuals, each of which kept an eye on a specific robot during each match.

Offensive power rating ; individual data ; rank if ind. data

492,PacificNW,28.1997745022847 ; 15.5 ; 7
360,PacificNW,24.6592693081115 ; 21.4 ; 3
1359,PacificNW,23.472463879954 ; 23.0 ; 2
1891,PacificNW,21.7517238635796 ; 16.1 ; 6
254,PacificNW,21.4957546988693 ; 13.5 ; 9
488,PacificNW,20.1777380169188 ; 24.9 ; 1
948,PacificNW,20.1649819298451 ; 18.1 ; 5
949,PacificNW,18.8042524648687 ; 11.7 ; 10

There is a correlation between good and poor scorers when considering the entire list, but the error in the ranking is as high as the number of alliances for the finals.

You would not want to use the power rating to do any picking if you are lucky enough to be picking in the nationals. Neither would you want to be using your own scoring from prior regionals as significant changes in performance can occur. You need to field a scoring team for your divison at the nationals. Doing a good job of that will serve you well...

Eugene

Those are some interesting statistics. So how did these rankings factor in while picking alliance partners for your team? Especially where 1569 fit in as a first round draft pick.

Also which matches does this data include? as far as practice, qualifying, and elimination matches.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 18:29
eugenebrooks eugenebrooks is offline
Team Role: Engineer
AKA: Dr. Brooks
no team (WRRF)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 601
eugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by fsayre
Those are some interesting statistics. So how did these rankings factor in while picking alliance partners for your team? Especially where 1569 fit in as a first round draft pick.

Also which matches does this data include? as far as practice, qualifying, and elimination matches.

Thanks!
The practice matches were used to practice gathering statistics. Our ranking data only includes qualifying matches.

This particular regional was our first for taking such detailed data. It is very hard work. The data was looked at for alliance selection but was not used to determine choices in a rigid way at Portland. The performance of teams in the finals at Portland validated our data, and also added the requirement to consider another important factor, our assessment of a teams willingness to play ball with the strategy of the alliance.

Our actual ranking data kept track of autonomous, points scored, defense, getting on the platform, penalties and win/loss record (seed). Points scored by the team in a match is important, but not the whole story. These independent rankings were merged with a formula that put priorities on what we considered important in forming an alliance specifically with us.

488 was number one in our combined rank at Portland. By our books it was top ranked in scoring, 7th in autonomous, 19th in defense, 20th for getting on the platform, and 10th for win/loss record.

1569 was number two in our combined rank at Portland, 4th for scoring, 1st for autonomous, 2nd for defense, first for getting on the platform, and 14th for win/loss record.

1359 was number three in our combined rank at Portland, 2nd for scoring, 3rd for autonomous, 40th for defense, 8th for getting on the platform, and 1st for win/loss record.

The lesson that we took away from PNW was to go with our data, although there is an important role for hunches with regard to the potentially different play that occurs during finals matches. Sometimes a team reserves a capability as a surprise for the finals matches and it pays to evaluate that possibility when inviting alliance partners, even if their ranking in your teams individual scoring is not that high...

Eugene

Last edited by eugenebrooks : 09-04-2006 at 18:35.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 18:46
Nawaid Ladak's Avatar
Nawaid Ladak Nawaid Ladak is offline
The Banana People Are Awsome!
AKA: Nawaid Ladak
FRC #0945 (Team Banana)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 1,021
Nawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant futureNawaid Ladak has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Nawaid Ladak Send a message via MSN to Nawaid Ladak Send a message via Yahoo to Nawaid Ladak
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Where is GTR in that list, i don't c it in there
__________________
"When you make a mistake, admit it, correct it, and learn from it - immediately."-Stephen Covey
I can still learn from this quote, how about you?

Nawaid Ladak
2003-2006 FRC # 1402: Freedom Force. Scouting
2007 FRC # 1694: RoboWarriors. Mentor
2008-Present FRC # 945: Team Banana. Mentor

Contact me
E-mail: LadakN (at) GMail (dot) com

Twitter / Facebook / Youtube
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 19:42
Kims Robot's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Kims Robot Kims Robot is offline
Onto a New Chapter...
AKA: Kim O'Toole Eckhardt
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 1,467
Kims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kims Robot
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

First off, GTR isnt in there because:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw239
I am willing to do BAE, UTC, or GTR if someone will give me the match data for those regionals.
And I spent way too long in excel today with sooo many nested IF statements, trying to get team averages with an actual formula, and then ranking the teams by their averages... My file is attached for anyone interested. It should be easy to update if we get any of the other info.

Great List I remember using this last year in our scouting!

And the reason this data doesnt correlate with ranking is because it doesnt factor in the other team's score, just your own points. (I think thats why its called Offensive Power). The teams that ranked higher with lower OPR did so because either their opponents scored more, or they scored more for their opponents.
Attached Files
File Type: zip OffensivePowerRatings_Rankings.zip (72.0 KB, 142 views)
__________________
~kim~
Kimberly O'Toole Eckhardt <3
Principal Systems Engineer & Program Manager
History - Team 176, Team 229, Team 1511, FIRST Volunteer!!
My new FIRST Photography Hobby & Angry Eric's Fan Page
Excellence - is the result of caring more than others think is wise, risking more than others think is safe, dreaming more than others think is practical, and expecting more than others think is possible.

Last edited by Kims Robot : 09-04-2006 at 19:44.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 20:18
sw293 sw293 is offline
Former Coach (2005)
AKA: Scott Weingart
FRC #0293 (SPIKE)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pennington, NJ
Posts: 123
sw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

The power ratings have been updated with the matches from SBPLI and slightly adjusted to correct a small (average +/-0.1 points per team) error.
__________________
Team 293
Uncrowned Champions, 2005 Philadelphia Regional
Champions, 2007 Chesapeake Regional
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2006, 22:54
Fred Sayre's Avatar
Fred Sayre Fred Sayre is offline
Registered User
AKA: Fred Sayre
FRC #0488 (xbot)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 141
Fred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Fred Sayre
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by eugenebrooks
The practice matches were used to practice gathering statistics. Our ranking data only includes qualifying matches.

Sometimes a team reserves a capability as a surprise for the finals matches

Eugene
Heh, like the effectiveness of 254


...Thanks for your detailed description, it was very informative! I am glad we at least made it on someones radar at pnw. It would have been a pleasure to play with you guys in the finals either way

Good luck in Atlanta, maybe we will see you guys down there!
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2006, 01:07
Ken Streeter's Avatar
Ken Streeter Ken Streeter is online now
Let the MAYHEM begin!
FRC #1519 (Mechanical Mayhem)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Team: Milford, NH; Me: Bedford, NH
Posts: 468
Ken Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

SW293,

At the time the original list of these offensive power ratings was posted, the match data for the BAE, UTC, and GTR regionals were not available on the FIRST web pages. The data from BAE and GTR qualifiying matches seems to now be available, however. Would it be possible to post an update of the offensive power ratings with these tournaments included?

BAE: http://www2.usfirst.org/2006comp/Events/NH/matches.html

UTC (still no qualifiers): http://www2.usfirst.org/2006comp/Events/CT/matches.html

GTR (no elims): http://www2.usfirst.org/2006comp/Events/ON/matches.html

Thanks!
__________________
Ken Streeter - Team 1519 - Mechanical Mayhem (Milford Area Youth Homeschoolers Enriching Minds)
2015 NE District Winners with 195 & 2067, 125 & 1786, 230 & 4908, and 95 & 1307
2013 World Finalists & Archimedes Division Winners with 33 & 469
2013 & 2012 North Carolina Regional Winners with teams 435 & 4828 and 1311 & 2642
2011, 2010, 2006 Granite State Regional Winners with teams 175 & 176, 1073 & 1058, and 1276 & 133
Team 1519 Video Gallery - including Chairman's Video, and the infamous "Speed Racer!"
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-04-2006, 20:21
sw293 sw293 is offline
Former Coach (2005)
AKA: Scott Weingart
FRC #0293 (SPIKE)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pennington, NJ
Posts: 123
sw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of lightsw293 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: 2006 Offensive Power Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Streeter
SW293,

At the time the original list of these offensive power ratings was posted, the match data for the BAE, UTC, and GTR regionals were not available on the FIRST web pages. The data from BAE and GTR qualifiying matches seems to now be available, however. Would it be possible to post an update of the offensive power ratings with these tournaments included?

BAE: http://www2.usfirst.org/2006comp/Events/NH/matches.html

UTC (still no qualifiers): http://www2.usfirst.org/2006comp/Events/CT/matches.html

GTR (no elims): http://www2.usfirst.org/2006comp/Events/ON/matches.html

Thanks!
I did BAE and GTR, although GTR didn't have complete data from qualifications (only matches 1-96). I cannot run the OPR algorithm on elimination rounds alone because the alliances never change.
__________________
Team 293
Uncrowned Champions, 2005 Philadelphia Regional
Champions, 2007 Chesapeake Regional
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PIC18F8722 - New 2006 RC MPU, 4x more program memory! kmcclary Programming 16 08-01-2006 14:22
**FIRST EMAIL**/Welcome to the 2006 FIRST Robotics Competition Season! Rich Wong FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive 0 06-09-2005 19:19
power of globe motor with gear box? Ken Leung Motors 5 21-11-2001 13:43
Max mechanical power of motors, how is it useful? Ken Leung Motors 1 09-11-2001 14:15


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:49.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi