|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What kind of collaboration are you comfortable with? (see first post for definitions) | |||
| Full collaboration is ok when teams attend the same regional |
|
29 | 34.94% |
| Full collaboration is ok when teams attend seperate regionals |
|
32 | 38.55% |
| Full collaboration is ok when teams live far apart |
|
28 | 33.73% |
| Full collaboration is ok when teams live in the same area |
|
28 | 33.73% |
| Full collaboration is ok for an indefinete period of time |
|
22 | 26.51% |
| Full collaboration is ok only if done for a new team's rookie year |
|
21 | 25.30% |
| Full collaboration is NEVER ok |
|
13 | 15.66% |
| Partial collaboration is ok when teams attend the same regional |
|
45 | 54.22% |
| Partial collaboration is ok when teams attend seperate regionals |
|
42 | 50.60% |
| Partial collaboration is ok when teams live far apart |
|
36 | 43.37% |
| Partial collaboration is ok when teams live in the same area |
|
43 | 51.81% |
| Partial collaboration is ok for an indefinete period of time |
|
40 | 48.19% |
| Partial collaboration is ok only if done for a new team's rookie year |
|
26 | 31.33% |
| Partial collaboration is ok if done for the drivetrain |
|
41 | 49.40% |
| Partial collaboration is ok if done for the 'game piece' such as a shooter or stacker |
|
39 | 46.99% |
| Partial collaboration is NEVER ok |
|
2 | 2.41% |
| Interface collaboration is ok when teams attend the same regional |
|
34 | 40.96% |
| Interface collaboration is ok when teams attend seperate regionals |
|
30 | 36.14% |
| Interface collaboration is ok when teams live far apart |
|
30 | 36.14% |
| Interface collaboration is ok when teams live in the same area |
|
33 | 39.76% |
| Interface collaboration is ok for an indefinete period of time |
|
33 | 39.76% |
| Interface collaboration is ok only if done for a new team's rookie year, then they are cut loose |
|
18 | 21.69% |
| Interface collaboration is NEVER ok |
|
9 | 10.84% |
| Teams should not collaborate |
|
9 | 10.84% |
| Teams should collaborate |
|
50 | 60.24% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The great collaboration poll
My views on collaboration
Interface :collaboration I fully support this. I think it would be incredibly cool and effective if two teams would create complimentary robots that worked terrifically together while still being competitive apart. It would be complicated and difficult but exciting and rewarding. It might be risky for competition but the potential rewards in competition are great. If, say, it were suggested that 179 and 180 do this I would back it. Full collaboration: I definitely see the benefits to doing this. More minds and resources directed at a problem usually results in a better to solution to the problem as shown by the exploits of the Triplets and 254-968? Twins. It is also cheaper to build identical robots together than the same number of different robots separately. Another huge advantage that I think has been overlooked is that the collaborate teams that I have seen have all built another identical practice robot. I cannot stress enough about how big an advantage this is. This basically lengthens a collaborate teams build season since they have an extra robot to modify\test\program\practice with during the fix-it windows. I know my team would be much more effective if we didn't have to rebuild and program our robot during our competitions. Yet, if it were suggested that my team fully collaborate with another I would be firmly against it. For me it would take away from the fun and the amount of experience gained. I like seeing six very different robots on the field competing. However, I do not think that complete collaborate is cheating. I also think that if teams want to calibrate like this than they are welcome to. I just don't like it and don't think it would be good for me or my team (selfish I know but that's the way it is). ![]() Last edited by JJG13 : 10-04-2006 at 20:47. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ideal Alliance Structure | Lil' Lavery | Rules/Strategy | 34 | 22-04-2006 18:21 |
| 2006 Great Lakes Reigonal | DjAlamose | Regional Competitions | 45 | 16-03-2006 06:25 |
| A new step in collaboration: FIRST Programmers' Guild | Tom Bottiglieri | Programming | 48 | 15-02-2006 14:46 |
| Shooters & Percentage Poll | Joe Johnson | General Forum | 16 | 14-02-2006 13:55 |
| Huskies... wow, what a great bunch | archiver | 2000 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:45 |