|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [Official 2007 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas
I really don't see the benefit of going 1-8,8-1 in alliance selections. Is there data showing that this drafting method helps lower seeded teams? How many regional winners were 1-4 seeds in 2005 vs 2006?
What would be an interesting twist is not allowing an alliance captain to pick another alliance captain. This is probably a better way of 'leveling' the field for the finals. I would imagine that many alliances that win regionals consist of 2 top 8 teams. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Official 2007 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2007 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 44 | 17-12-2006 17:05 |
| [Official 2007 Game Design] Game Elements and Subtasks | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 80 | 06-12-2006 21:40 |
| [Official 2006 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 40 | 17-12-2005 15:33 |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 42 | 26-04-2005 19:19 |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Game Elements and Subtasks | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 60 | 19-10-2004 21:06 |