Go to Post Show me the mentor who has never built a bad robot and I'll show you either a new mentor, a liar, or Andy Baker. - Andrew Schreiber [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > FRC Game Design
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-05-2006, 09:32
Peter Matteson's Avatar
Peter Matteson Peter Matteson is offline
Ambitious but rubbish!
FRC #0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,653
Peter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Official 2007 Game Design] Autonomy And Other Technology Discussions

I would like to see two to three completely different possible scoring methods for auton.

One that any team can easily do with dead reckoning. This would be the low hanging fruit that any team should be able toreach and worth the least points.

One that requires a level of sensor feedback to accomplish worth a moderate amount of points. This should be attainable with software out of the box so that teams who put the effort in can accomplish this.

The third should be a pie in the sky real challenge that has a corresponding bonus to make it worth the effort for the teams to do this.

I know that first has tried to do some of this over the last few years but I like the idea of challenging the veterans but still keeping things accessible to the rookies and mid-level teams. This tiered objective system would allow teams to work towards a goal if they saw it recur over a few years. Also you could illuminate each with a different color vision target like we saw on Einstien this year.
__________________
2011 Championship Finalists/Archimedes Division Championships w/ 2016 & 781
2010 Championship Winners/Newton Division Champions
Thank-you 294 & 67

2009 Newton Division Champions w/ 1507 & 121
2008 Archimedes Division Champions w/ 1124 & 1024
2007 Championship Winners/Newton Division Champions w/190, 987 & 177 The Wall of Maroon
2006 Galileo Division Champions w/ 1126 & 201
www.bobcatrobotics.org
"If you can't do it with brains, it won't be done with hours." - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Official 2007 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2007 game... dlavery FRC Game Design 44 17-12-2006 17:05
[Official 2007 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas dlavery FRC Game Design 60 02-12-2006 11:54
[Official 2006 Game Design] Autonomy And Other Technology Discussions dlavery FRC Game Design 36 12-11-2005 17:49
[Official 2005 Game Design] Game Elements and Subtasks dlavery FRC Game Design 60 19-10-2004 21:06
[Official 2005 Game Design] Autonomy Discussions dlavery FRC Game Design 53 04-09-2004 22:29


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi