Go to Post TL, DR: You may be skilled at karate on your own, but imagine how much better you'll be with Mr. Miyagi mentoring you. - artdutra04 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > FRC Game Design
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-05-2006, 23:38
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,606
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: [Official 2007 Game Design] Autonomy And Other Technology Discussions

Keep autonomous big. Keep it REALLY big. This year was good, but it could be MORE. And KEEP robot interaction in auto.
While rookies and some teams may suffer from big auto modes, with auto modes that enable and even promote interaction by having big rewards and close starting positions you can create simpler auto codes that can alter the autonomous portion of the game. A simple "drive straight" code could change whether or not the opponent managed to hit a bunch of shots in the center, or none. It allows for basically a lesser function autonomous to acheive an important goal. You don't even need an advanced manipulator to accomplish it.
Another cool idea would to be follow FVC's example. Many people have talked about having auto portions of the field. FVC had two seperate games, autonomous and operator controlled. Your rankings in both games were averaged to form you overall seed, then you picked your alliance partners and played the operator controlled for the elimination rounds. The auto game also had slightly different rules (the field was divided into 4 sections, one for each team, center goal was worth 2 points, no ownership of goals, and only 30 seconds instead of 2 minutes). I would have liked to see it have the same rules though, with the exception of maybe staying 30 seconds instead of 2 minutes. Interaction and alliance partners would have made interesting strategy discussion, along with deciding which goals to pursue, as you couldn't adjust to the opponent's strategy afterwards. Scouting and pre-game strategy would become incredibly important.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Official 2007 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2007 game... dlavery FRC Game Design 44 17-12-2006 17:05
[Official 2007 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas dlavery FRC Game Design 60 02-12-2006 11:54
[Official 2006 Game Design] Autonomy And Other Technology Discussions dlavery FRC Game Design 36 12-11-2005 17:49
[Official 2005 Game Design] Game Elements and Subtasks dlavery FRC Game Design 60 19-10-2004 21:06
[Official 2005 Game Design] Autonomy Discussions dlavery FRC Game Design 53 04-09-2004 22:29


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:48.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi