Go to Post I told myself I'd stay out of the obsession this year, but I couldn't resist... - Grant Cox [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > IT / Communications > 3D Animation and Competition
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-08-2006, 18:20
6600gt's Avatar
6600gt 6600gt is offline
Registered User
AKA: Lohit
FRC #0226 (Hammerhead)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 221
6600gt is a jewel in the rough6600gt is a jewel in the rough6600gt is a jewel in the rough
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Quote:
Originally Posted by addictedMax
and intels are good at things like rendering
Usually because the software is optimized for them...otherwise AMDs are not bad either...
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-08-2006, 19:50
Cody Carey's Avatar
Cody Carey Cody Carey is offline
,':-)
AKA: C. Carey
FRC #0306 (CRT)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Corry, PA
Posts: 1,137
Cody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cody Carey Send a message via Yahoo to Cody Carey
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6600gt
Clock does not determin performance. That is why AMD beat Intel until now. the new Xeons are far more advanced and do more per clock than those G4s ever could. The Xeons can do more instructions per clock than those G4s ever could.
The old 3GHz P4s could do 10,000 MIPS.
Clock speed tells nothing about its MIPS or the performance of the processor
No they don't, the clock speed determines how many instructions per second. Period. Just because the new Xeons are more "advanced" doesn't change the definition of megahertz. The farm of G4s do more instructions per clock (not considering other system specs, just processor) than the Xeon's does, even if you take into consideration the four logical processors...

The average studio quality scene takes an hour per frame to render.If the Xeon takes an hour to render it, and the G4s take 3 hours each, then they still win... because in 3 hours the Xeon will have rendered 3 frames, and the G4s will have rendered 36.

In standard rendering programs (like the default scan-line renderer for 3dSmax), three of the four cores in a quad-core processor are wasted, because the renderer only uses one. I have no Idea about the standard renderers for Maya, but I wouldn't imagine they could be much different.

The Xeon computer would have to be more than 36 times faster than its G4 predecessor to have better rendering capabilities, and that just isn't plausible.
__________________
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-08-2006, 20:50
Capt.ArD Capt.ArD is offline
Animator
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
Team Role: Animator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 195
Capt.ArD will become famous soon enoughCapt.ArD will become famous soon enough
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Edit: double post.
__________________

Last edited by Capt.ArD : 24-08-2006 at 21:02.
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-08-2006, 21:01
Capt.ArD Capt.ArD is offline
Animator
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
Team Role: Animator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 195
Capt.ArD will become famous soon enoughCapt.ArD will become famous soon enough
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Agreed, other things influence the performance of a computer than clock. buswidth allows more simultaneous calculations, and therefore increases the net work done. Dual cores act essentially as a tiny renderfarm on one chip, and do the same thing. It's not about the clock, men, there are more important things...

Quote:
If the Xeon takes an hour to render it, and the G4s take 3 hours each
Just a nitpick, a one hour Xeon scene would probably take a 400MHz processor five or seven hours to do, probably more. We strive for accuracy...

Quote:
(not considering other system specs, just processor)
dont dismiss. The discussion is about what computer will render faster, not processor. ram and graphics cards play just as important a role in this as the processor.

Quote:
In standard rendering programs (like the default scan-line renderer for 3dSmax), three of the four cores in a quad-core processor are wasted, because the renderer only uses one. I have no Idea about the standard renderers for Maya, but I wouldn't imagine they could be much different.
Scanline does go faster with dual cores, BTW. And mental ray adds buckets for more cores. watch a dual core render in MR. you'll see TWO boxes going at it.
__________________
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-08-2006, 21:15
Cody Carey's Avatar
Cody Carey Cody Carey is offline
,':-)
AKA: C. Carey
FRC #0306 (CRT)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Corry, PA
Posts: 1,137
Cody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cody Carey Send a message via Yahoo to Cody Carey
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Quote:
Just a nitpick, a one hour Xeon scene would probably take a 400MHz processor five or seven hours to do, probably more. We strive for accuracy...
Ok, I'm sorry for my innaccuracies, in 7 hours, the xeon would only have 7 frames done, and the render farm would have 36... the Xeon still looses, which is the point I was trying to make.
Quote:
dont dismiss. The discussion is about what computer will render faster, not processor. ram and graphics cards play just as important a role in this as the processor.
By your own admission in the first quote in this post, the render farm will still render faster. Don't sidestep.

Quote:
Scanline does go faster with dual cores, BTW. And mental ray adds buckets for more cores. watch a dual core render in MR. you'll see TWO boxes going at it.
I didn't mention a word about Mental Ray.
Now onto what I actually said, and not what was brought to the table by people other than myself. Can you show me documentation that says the default Scanline renderer provided with Max uses all the processors present in a computer? because I have timed a render on our quad-core 2.8 at the school, and It did no better than my single-core 2.8 at home.
__________________
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-08-2006, 21:57
Chris27's Avatar
Chris27 Chris27 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Freeman
FRC #1625 (Winnovation)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Mountain View
Posts: 196
Chris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant future
Re: Mac G4 render farm

codyc, mhz has very little to do with how much gets done. IPC, or instructions per clock cycle is what determines how much work a processor can do per mhz. just look up some benchmarks of a lower clocked processor like a dothan (pentium m) or conroe (core 2 duo) and compare them to a higher clocked processor like a prescott (pentium 4). you will find that a conroe at 2 ghz can compete with a pressler (pentium d) at 5+ghz. A lower clocked chip with a very high IPC is better then a higher clocked chip with a low IPC. high MHZ = lots of heat, and wasted energy. that is why the pentium 4 turned into a disaster while the athlon 64 kicked butt.

there are still many other factors such as bandwidth, latency, cache, ARCHITECTURE etc.

unless you are comparing the mhz speed of the exact same chip, you are doing a hopeless apples to oranges comparison. Even if you are comparing the same chip, performance does not scale linearly to mhz. a 4ghz chip is not going to be twice as powerful as the same chip clocked at 2ghz.

Last edited by Chris27 : 24-08-2006 at 22:10.
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-08-2006, 22:51
Capt.ArD Capt.ArD is offline
Animator
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
Team Role: Animator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 195
Capt.ArD will become famous soon enoughCapt.ArD will become famous soon enough
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Quote:
By your own admission in the first quote in this post, the render farm will still render faster. Don't sidestep.
Who's sidestepping? It's a valid point.

Quote:
I didn't mention a word about Mental Ray.
I did. It's also a valid point. Sorry if MR kicks scanline out the window.

Quote:
there are still many other factors such as bandwidth, latency, cache, ARCHITECTURE etc.
Thank you, this is what i ws trying to say. It's not the clock, or how many processors you have. It s the overall setup.
__________________
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 00:41
Cody Carey's Avatar
Cody Carey Cody Carey is offline
,':-)
AKA: C. Carey
FRC #0306 (CRT)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Corry, PA
Posts: 1,137
Cody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cody Carey Send a message via Yahoo to Cody Carey
Re: Mac G4 render farm

In this particular setup, however... the g4s would far out perform the Xeon.
__________________
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 00:51
Happy Birthday! theycallhimtom theycallhimtom is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tom Conerly
FRC #1540 (The Flaming Chickens)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, Oregon
Posts: 52
theycallhimtom has a spectacular aura abouttheycallhimtom has a spectacular aura abouttheycallhimtom has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to theycallhimtom Send a message via MSN to theycallhimtom
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Sure the render farm would be faster than one single computer. But consider other things. There needs to be a network so add the cost of that. The space for 36 computers, power costs etc. Then the time to setup and keep the cluster running would be a pain.

Over the summer I had an internship at a local college. My teacher had a 48 computer cluster (each one with dual Pentium 3s) it was a pain to keep everything running. After a few years the motherboards stopped working so they had to be replaced by hand. etc.
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 08:04
Chris27's Avatar
Chris27 Chris27 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Freeman
FRC #1625 (Winnovation)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Mountain View
Posts: 196
Chris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant futureChris27 has a brilliant future
Re: Mac G4 render farm

well for $4000 you could make 6 computers based on an amd x2 or a core 2 duo that will easily outperform all of those macs.
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 14:35
addictedMax's Avatar
addictedMax addictedMax is offline
The No Man
AKA: Tom L
FRC #1094 (Channel Cats)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 74
addictedMax will become famous soon enough
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris27
well for $4000 you could make 6 computers based on an amd x2 or a core 2 duo that will easily outperform all of those macs.
atlon 64's even
__________________
Hi I'm Addicted to 3ds Max, I don't need help though not at all
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 14:43
Cody Carey's Avatar
Cody Carey Cody Carey is offline
,':-)
AKA: C. Carey
FRC #0306 (CRT)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Corry, PA
Posts: 1,137
Cody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cody Carey Send a message via Yahoo to Cody Carey
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris27
codyc, mhz has very little to do with how much gets done. IPC, or instructions per clock cycle is what determines how much work a processor can do per mhz. just look up some benchmarks of a lower clocked processor like a dothan (pentium m) or conroe (core 2 duo) and compare them to a higher clocked processor like a prescott (pentium 4). you will find that a conroe at 2 ghz can compete with a pressler (pentium d) at 5+ghz. A lower clocked chip with a very high IPC is better then a higher clocked chip with a low IPC. high MHZ = lots of heat, and wasted energy. that is why the pentium 4 turned into a disaster while the athlon 64 kicked butt.

there are still many other factors such as bandwidth, latency, cache, ARCHITECTURE etc.

unless you are comparing the mhz speed of the exact same chip, you are doing a hopeless apples to oranges comparison. Even if you are comparing the same chip, performance does not scale linearly to mhz. a 4ghz chip is not going to be twice as powerful as the same chip clocked at 2ghz.





This is true, but the clock speed is all we have to go in in this scenario... we know nothing more about the Mac G4s than the clock speed, so we can't say which has more ram or a better video card. All we can do is assume, and as stated before... we strive for accuracy. Making calculations based on clock speeds when nothing else is known about a computer is in no way a mistake, It's working with what was given to solve a problem that was presented.

About the heat caused by Pentium 4s, I don't know if you're much into researching the reasons behind problems, but I am. The extra heat of a Pentium 4 is due to the fact that they require more core voltage to operate. My 2.8 Pentium 4 requires a core voltage of 1.8v while my brothers athlon equivalent only asks 1.6v, and yes mine runs hotter, but it beats his in all of the benchmarks. If there is more energy going into the core, then more energy will have to come out, and alot of it will be heat, but every bit as much energy will will still be going into the practical functions of the processor. High megahertz does not equal lots of heat, High core voltage does. High megahertz equals faster ability to process data.

I have searched and searched for the benchmarks That state that a
5.0 Ghz looses to a 2.0Ghz, and I just can't find them... mind pointing out where you found them?
I sure hope you didn't take those numbers out of thin air...

and as for the 6 computers that would beat the 36, you may be absolutely correct, but that has nothing to do with the question that was asked, so don't present it like a point in your argument.

As for the render wall costing more in energy and labor than the single computer... The 46 extra cents a day (when you have the machines running) and having to replace hardware every couple of years is worth it
when you have a deadline coming up and your singe Xeon can't render your project fast enough.



This is starting to feel pretty hostile, So I'm done.

-Cody C
__________________
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 15:22
David55 David55 is offline
Registered User
AKA: David Hillman
FRC #1577 (Steampunk) & FRC #125 (NUTRONS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Raanana, Israel / Boston, MA
Posts: 279
David55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to beholdDavid55 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cody C
This is true, but the clock speed is all we have to go in in this scenario... we know nothing more about the Mac G4s than the clock speed, so we can't say which has more ram or a better video card. All we can do is assume, and as stated before... we strive for accuracy. -Cody C
Just wanted to point out that some of the specs are listed in the product description. All of the G4's have 128 MB of RAM and some have Dual Head or DVI videocards ( I am assuming these are the cards that came with the computer so they are not too advanced.)

And Cody, there is really no reason to leave this discussion. After all, we are just discussing a theoretical question about which system will render faster

David
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 16:00
Capt.ArD Capt.ArD is offline
Animator
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
Team Role: Animator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 195
Capt.ArD will become famous soon enoughCapt.ArD will become famous soon enough
Re: Mac G4 render farm

I think i am done as well, after this last post.

Quote:
Making calculations based on clock speeds when nothing else is known
Much is known. The specs of a xeon and of the G4 are only a google search away.
Xeon:
http://www.2cpu.com/articles/99_1.html
G4:
http://www.dealtime.com/xPF-New_Tech...z_7MXMG400_200

As per the benchmarks, I did them myself. I was speaking for what i have done and seen. Such were my observations, and many of my other computer friends have had similar experiences. I apologize if my using this information was offensive to anyone.
__________________
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2006, 17:02
Joohoo's Avatar
Joohoo Joohoo is offline
Registered User
FRC #0340 (G.R.R.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Rochester
Posts: 241
Joohoo is just really niceJoohoo is just really niceJoohoo is just really niceJoohoo is just really niceJoohoo is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Joohoo Send a message via Yahoo to Joohoo
Re: Mac G4 render farm

Another thing to look at the G4's is do they support OSX, they may be limited to OS 9.2 which could limit you to a somewhat volatile OS and not be able to get compatible software.

Last edited by Joohoo : 25-08-2006 at 17:05.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pic: 269's Westin Battery Farm Ricky Q. Extra Discussion 4 02-05-2006 07:16
single or a rendering farm? BuddyB309 3D Animation and Competition 17 09-02-2006 11:16
Test render Matt Hallock 3D Animation and Competition 7 26-01-2004 13:17
Setting up a render farm Ryan Dognaux 3D Animation and Competition 3 16-01-2004 00:26
Render FullScreen ? archiver 2001 0 24-06-2002 02:00


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi