|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: 114 wheel concept....again.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 114 wheel concept....again.
thats slick
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 114 wheel concept....again.
Just out of curiosity, what made you pick a 7/8" width (as opposed to, say, an inch)? Are you incorporating this into another design?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 wheel concept....again.
I picked this width because .5 is too small, and we used ecaxtly one, and it was too much... so I picked a medium.
|
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: 114 wheel concept....again.
Quote:
I am interested to find out why .5 is too small? Traction is not affected by surface contact so is there another reason this width was too small? I would think making wheels as small as possible while still giving them strength enough to survive competition, would be the way to go. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 wheel concept....again.
.5 is too small due to the size between frame members. Once we reach that size, we have to do some of the fram machining at other locations, which makes it cost more, and makes us unable to do the work at our shop. Plus, it makes smaller bolts necessary for parts to hold together, which makes working it take more time then the 1 inch width.
Also personal preference. It just looks darned stylish. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 114 wheel concept | CraigHickman | Technical Discussion | 8 | 22-06-2006 14:24 |
| Dual wheel per axle set crab-steer concept | Andrew Schuetze | Technical Discussion | 8 | 21-06-2006 08:55 |
| pic: 114: Stripped! | CraigHickman | Robot Showcase | 5 | 04-04-2006 23:49 |
| pic: 114 wheels | CraigHickman | Robot Showcase | 12 | 31-01-2006 15:50 |
| pic: Chantilly Academy's 4 Wheel Drive 4 Wheel Steering!!!! | jskene | Robot Showcase | 25 | 18-02-2005 20:24 |