|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Drive Train Comparison 2006
This really can't be answered by a single team.
If you look at non-turreting robots you have a number of teams with great drive trains. Triplets, Poof Twins, Martin Twins These teams were all very effictive in what they needed to do. All of these teams used there drive train to effectively keep them in place when shooting. If you look at turreting robots once again there are a number of good solid drive trains 217, 1126, 25 Once again these are the stronger teams that had turreting shooters. These teams were fast when they needed to be, and all could unload relatively fast so it didn't matter if you hit them, because given a few free seconds and the match was over. These drive trains seemed to me to be more freely moving than those that needed to fend off as they shot. Dumpers/Defenders 195, 522 These both stick out in my head because they could play defense, and it wasn't just because of their drive trains, which were pretty nice contraptions i must say. Automode: Kinda figured i must have something in here for automode since it was such a huge part. 71 Beatty once again was the team the impressed me the most. They had an odd kinda of drop down swerve drive to begin auto mode to get them in place and then they would unload. I really didn't see it run much but from what i did see it was by far one of the best drive train choices for automode. Just my 2 cents again |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Jester Drive:Mecanum Wheel Drive Train | Ken Delaney 357 | Technical Discussion | 64 | 29-03-2006 22:16 |
| [ECDU]:drive train | Michael Leicht | FIRST-related Organizations | 3 | 03-08-2004 16:23 |
| 2 truck drive train | Alex1072 | Technical Discussion | 14 | 26-03-2004 21:53 |
| Drive Train | Thunder360 | Motors | 5 | 21-03-2003 20:41 |
| Drive Train | archiver | 2000 | 1 | 24-06-2002 00:37 |