Solid core inductance

[Al Skierkiewicz]

Guys,
Just for the record, I have seen people get dead from these voltages. Why do you think they put all those stickers on appliances? There is an old pilots adage that can be applied here. "There are old electrical engineers and there are bold electrical engineers. There are NO old, bold electrical engineers! One of my instructors on the first day of AC electronics class told us this...
"Learn to identify people who do not have respect for exposed voltage. Stay away from them for when they go, they take others with them." If you don't think (and believe) that 120 volts is high voltage and lethal I can have a couple of hundred electricians and linemen convince you otherwise. Do you know why the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers was formed in 1894? Because the average life expectancy of an electrician was 34 years of age due to working with line voltage.

[[527]phil]

But you have to realize that although this is a high voltage system, the amperage is far less then the electric coming from your outlet.

[Richard Wallace]

Originally Posted by [527]phil

But you have to realize that although this is a high voltage system, the amperage is far less then the electric coming from your outlet.

While you are correct that a wall socket can deliver more current (typical breaker rating is 20A), it takes far less than that to kill a person.

Look here (you brought up Wikipedia earlier in this thread) for more on the physiology of electric shock.

You also said earlier that you have two capacitors of 500 uF each.

200 Volts x 1000 uF = 0.2 Coulomb, enough electric charge to deliver a peak electric current of 200 milliAmperes to a 1000 Ohm load; your body, for example, might be represented by about this resistance, depending on ambient humidity and how sweaty you are. That current will decay with a time constant of 1 second. Delivered to one hand while the other hand is on the return path, that current pulse is sufficient to put your heart into ventricular fibrillation. Of course you might be lucky and not present such an ideal circuit path to your heart on the first try, but your luck would not hold out forever if you kept trying again and again.

I strongly urge you to read up a bit more, and not to attempt experimental verification of the analysis above.

[[527]phil]

Which is the exact reason i use the one hand rule. I only work on the circuit while it's charged with one hand, the other is in my pocket.

[Al Skierkiewicz]

Originally Posted by [527]phil

Which is the exact reason i use the one hand rule. I only work on the circuit while it's charged with one hand, the other is in my pocket.

That is an excellent start!

I have to ask why you are not using a linear power supply to charge up the caps. It seems like an easy way to accomplish a 200 volt source.

[[527]phil]

Well mainly because the power supply i have is a kit I built a few years ago, and only goes up to 12 volts. But the main reason is i want to be able to finish the coil gun and know that i made it from "scratch."

That, and the fact that i need to drag my presentation out to a full 40 minutes, so I'd rather go through the formulas, and show how the boost converter works rather then just say "well this power supply charges the caps". But yes, using a power supply would be MUCH easier, but just ask my mentor, "easy" is not in my vocabulary

[Adam Y.]

That is an excellent start!

I have to ask why you are not using a linear power supply to charge up the caps. It seems like an easy way to accomplish a 200 volt source.

Would a voltage multiplier work??? Abeit, I have no idea if that type of design would applicable since it's a high voltage and low current device.

[Al Skierkiewicz]

The simplest thing to do in this situation would be to get a line operated high voltage transformer with a secondary winding of 300 volts center tap. (I am guessing right now at the numbers) In a full wave rectifier, you might be able to get 200 volts DC to charge the caps or to fire the energizing coil. Transformer cost in the $50 + range new, total supply less than $100 (fuse, line cord, diodes and trerminal strips). This is a common transformer in tube type equipment and might be found in a junk TV or radio or at a Hamfest.
What Phil is trying to make is what some people call a "whistler supply". It uses a low voltage DC power source like a bank of batteries, running an oscilator to produce an AC voltage capable of driving a low voltage primary winding on a transformer. The secondary winding is a high voltage winding much the same as the linear supply described above. The difference is the transformer core. At 60 Hz you need a lot of iron to couple from the primary to secondary windings. At 1.5 kHz or above, the core becomes more efficient and so the need for a heavy iron core is diminished. MOst often these supplies are actually running at much higher frequencies like 10-15 kHz. When they operate, the supply can be heard as whistling. This type of supply is comon in a camera photo flash unit when first turned on. Since you need an oscillator and high power driver (sometimes the same device) this is a much more complex device. The upside is the transformer is a fraction of the weight of a line operated supply. However, 200 volts is still 200 volts regardless of how you get there.
High voltage batteries were plentiful at one time when portable radios were tube operated. Finding them now is next to impossible.