|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
If in fact we are not building robots, does that make our work any less important or inspirational?
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
Quote:
I've talked to various people at demos and such who think FIRST is no big deal because they think that FRC robots are not real robots. After talking a few minutes about autonomous modes and some of the programming and sensing challenges involved, some of these people still think that FRC 'bots are not robots. Then, I mention the whole mentoring and inspiration part of FIRST. At that point, if they STILL want to argue that FRC does not involve robots, but rather remote-controlled devices, I agree with them and hope they don't ever get involved. Mabye I'm quick to judge here, but if someone is that hung up on a simple definition and can't see the point of the program, then we're probably better off without them. AB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
What’s in a name? That which we call a robot, by any other word would smell of magic smoke.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
Quote:
![]() Wetzel |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
FLL's got robots!
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
Yeah, they do. No teleoperation there. Well, maybe a little bit of dead reckoning, or point-and-shoot.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/portal.php?
Because Lego robots don't turn into a massive disaster if you misprogram it.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/portal.php?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/portal.php?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/portal.php?
Yeah, I misunderstood your first post.
That happened to us in '05 we were testing auto mode and the robot took off into all the desks in the classroom while we scrambled trying to turn it off. ![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
Thats true.
Does it make sense that the FLL robots made mostly by middle school students are autonomous, but the FRC robots, build by high school students and real engineers, aren't? Last edited by EHaskins : 13-12-2006 at 15:36. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
As Woodie or Dave said at kickoff a couple years ago, "We know autonomous is hard - that's why we make FLL do it."
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
Quote:
Programming autonomous for just your own bot is one thing, making it have to interact with the 5 other bots on the field is another. ![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are FIRST robots actually robots?
<off topic>
lets give FLL mplab... the CMUcam, a few gyros, ultrasonic rangefinders, geartooth counters, IR rangefinders, limit switchs, and potentiometers. We'll just see how much their robots will do then. </off topic> I say if it still has magic smoke inside of it, and is capable of at one point releasing that magic smoke, its a robot. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are the robots getting too heavy? | Peter Matteson | Rules/Strategy | 16 | 11-01-2006 16:36 |
| Robots really are nuclear powered | suneel112 | Electrical | 14 | 25-04-2004 12:25 |
| How are robots lowered? | Yan Wang | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 22-02-2004 22:10 |
| Robots are taking over........ | Adam Y. | General Forum | 15 | 05-08-2003 13:43 |
| Who's robots are driving already? | Anton Abaya | General Forum | 67 | 16-02-2002 00:07 |