|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: 1881 new gearbox design
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1881 new gearbox design
Is the gearbox a servo shift
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1881 new gearbox design
Nice compact design! Great to see a second year team looking to design gearboxes. Out of curiousity, how are you shifting? i.e. dog, mesh, ball, or an entirely new method?
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1881 new gearbox design
Dual speed, Check
Servo Shift, Check Compact Design, Check VERY Very good work guys, and Very good CAD model. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1881 new gearbox design
Have you considered how you will attach the CIM motors to the gearbox plates? You don't seem to be using both of the #10-32 UNF mounting holes on the front plate. Be aware that the other two holes on the front plate contain long bolts that hold the motor case together, and therefore may only be marginally suitable for mounting.
Also, while the lightening pockets are a good idea, have you considered that there's almost no clearance between opposite edges of the pocket in the lower corners. Unless you're casting it (not likely), or milling it with a tiny end mill (why?), you're going to have an issue with actually creating that detail. Also, you seem to have several non-circular curves in your lightening pockets. This implies you're going to make it on a CNC mill—is that your intention? If not, use straight-sided pockets. Last edited by Tristan Lall : 20-12-2006 at 09:14. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1881 new gearbox design
Counting the teeth. that gearbox has ratios of 2:1 and 3:1. with a CIM motor that gives you an approximate output speed of like 2500 rpm and 1500 rpm. that’s not getting much use for that gearbox's size and massively thick gears. and in an attempt to keep it small you removed the material of the plate that the motor needs to mount to. That is however some very impressive modeling with the pockets in the plates, the bearings and as far as I can tell from that render Nomenclatural correct Gears with some weight reduction. I remember myself modeling stuff like that back when just starting to use Cad and making it look super good. its just that i got so far into the aesthetic details of things that I skipped over doing the math in the bearing and meeting the requirements of my designs. Often a wheel speed to aim for is around 70RPM for a 6” wheel. In high gear, if you were to use that gearbox with a chain drive you would need a sprocket ratio of about 35:1 that may mean using a 12 tooth sprocket and a 420 tooth sprocket on your 6-inch wheel. seeing as how a 420T #35 sprocket would be around 50 inches in diameter. That won't work
Last edited by Tytus Gerrish : 20-12-2006 at 12:35. Reason: Spelling |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1881 new gearbox design
Thanks for the comments/suggestion. It's a ball lock shifter. I have relized my gearing mistakes, sorry i'm kinda new at this and made some math errors its back on the drawing board( well this case sketch plane) for me thanks.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1881 new gearbox design
No need to apologize, you didn't do anything wrong. your just learning. thats what the forums are for. please keep them coming. just Don't start taking bad blury pictures of things and call them teasers
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 114 gearbox design | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 4 | 05-12-2006 19:53 |
| pic: Our New T-Shirt Design!!! | Nathan Pell | Extra Discussion | 19 | 10-01-2005 00:10 |
| How to design a gearbox? | Hinkel Y. | Technical Discussion | 14 | 07-04-2004 23:06 |
| A question about gearbox design . . | Frank(Aflak) | Technical Discussion | 14 | 02-10-2003 14:57 |