|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: #25 Chain Information
Quote:
"any" is a pretty strong word. But, "many" is definitely true. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: #25 Chain Information
As long as you're designing mechanisms to transfer force correctly, there shouldn't be enough force to break the chain. However, I am only speaking from my experience, so if I'm entirely wrong, correct me. It's the best way I learn.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: #25 Chain Information
You need to design the system within the limits of the chain. For us, with a few of our drivetrain gearboxes, we were exceeding the maximum reccomended working load for the chain, but were still under the chains breaking load - just barely. We have tested it thouroughly enough to know that there is an obvious safety factor in the chain manufacturers quoted numbers, and as a result have designed our systems carefully enough around that, knowing one small misalignment or potential impact during a match could mean we break a chain. We take that risk, at the benefit of reduced weight and size. It is a fine line to walk, and you have to consider everything before you make that decision yourself.
Transfering 'force' should be clarified, too. #25 chain would probably transfer some force in this picture below just fine, however, the massive reduction in the gearbox means that as soon as you put any sort of 'real world load on the system, the chain will simply fail. The amount of force you wish to transfer has everything to do with what size chain you need. Below, we almost needed a chain larger than #35, but again, we figured if there was some sort of impact or collision during a match, we might actually prefer the chain break rather than the arm or frame of the robot itself. For drivetrains, it's worth running the numbers every year just to be sure that #25 will work. You can calculate this quite easily. 2 cims at 2ft/s would be safer with #35 chain in my book. ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: #25 Chain Information
Thanks to everyone for your input on this subject. I was wondering if you all could post some of the locations were you purchase your #25 chain and sprockets. 1251 is working on a few new ideas so your opinions and suggestions are much appricated on this subject. Finally, out of curiosity, the person who posted about the load numbers on 25 Vs. 35 chain were did you get those numbers?
Thanks, Drew |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: #25 Chain Information
If you only need very short lengths of #25 chain, the Electronic Goldmine sells it in 23" lengths for $2.49 each (they come with a master-link too). If you need longer lengths of chain or some #25 sprockets, McMaster is probably your best bet.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Information Technology or Information Systems ? | pheNIX637 | Career | 1 | 27-10-2005 18:43 |
| Chain Drive chain | Damelvin | 3D Animation and Competition | 2 | 15-02-2005 00:19 |
| 25 or 35 chain? | Alan Ing | Technical Discussion | 24 | 02-03-2003 13:56 |
| Chain and chain breaker source? | kmcclary | Off-Season Events | 4 | 22-10-2001 22:51 |
| chain | Lake Orion | OCCRA | 1 | 30-09-2001 13:20 |