Go to Post It never stops. Championships will be in your head forever!!! MWHAHAHAHA!!! - vadyr [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Programming
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2007, 00:50
Donut Donut is offline
The Arizona Mentor
AKA: Andrew
FRC #2662 (RoboKrew)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,306
Donut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Accelerometer Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6600gt View Post
Now I am not saying you are wrong, but how did you arrive at that 9ft/s robot achieving a 1.7g?

This would theoretically mean that, if it could go that fast, it could reach a speed of 54ft/s from 0ft/s in just one second. I thought that such G's might only be "possible" during a full speed collision.
I figured that for a robot with 6" diameter wheels to go at 9 ft/sec, it would have to have wheels spinning at 344 RPM. The CIM motors have a free spinning speed of roughly 5200 RPM, and a torque at stall of 2.4 N*m. Since we have 4 CIMs in our drive system usually, that would give us a stall torque of 9.8 N*m.

Reducing our RPM from the motors to 344, increases our stall torque to 148 N*m (this is ignoring all gear train inefficiencies). Dividing this by the radius of the wheel (.0762 meters) gives us 1942 N of force at stall. F = ma, so we divide the force by the robot's mass of 60.5 kg, and we get an acceleration of 32 m/s^2, which is actually 3.3 gs!

I had originally gotten 1.6 gs, but that's because I used the wheel's diameter in place of its radius.

Of course, this acceleration is actually impossible because the wheel traction would probably never allow for any force greater than 1000 N.

Collisions are much worse; I registered a 1 g acceleration on the accelerometer when it was only 5 degrees from vertical, which meant the impact generated was more like a 12 g acceleration. Driving around with it being used for position I've gotten .5 gs from the Vex robot, which is no where near the power of an FRC bot.
__________________
FRC Team 498 (Peoria, AZ), Student: 2004 - 2007
FRC Team 498 (Peoria, AZ), Mentor: 2008 - 2011
FRC Team 167 (Iowa City, IA), Mentor: 2012 - 2014
FRC Team 2662 (Tolleson, AZ), Mentor: 2014 - Present
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Accelerometer Readings hello1990ab Programming 5 04-04-2006 11:00
Accelerometer/Gyros? Idaman323 Programming 4 03-02-2006 23:20
Accelerometer railerobotics Programming 1 27-01-2006 02:59
Accelerometer Tom McCurdy Programming 5 30-01-2005 23:45
Accelerometer buss Electrical 1 09-01-2005 00:10


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:39.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi