|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The Canary Letter
So what do you guys think about the yellow card/ red card rule and having to carry the stigma of the yellow card for the rest of the tournament?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
I think this is an awesome addition! I'm glad they decided to implement it at all events. (We should all thank Andy Baker for starting this a few years back at the IRI) |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I think it's a good addition, it will be interesting to see how effective it's use is in competition. Hopefully this'll prevent aggressive teams from using potentially dangerous tactics.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I'm not a big fan, because it's a little vague. I mean, it's then up to the judge if a team is being too rough or not, which is much more subjective than before. Not that I'm saying my team is upset that we can't push people around like crazy. I just think it's less defined than before and open to interpretation.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Yes, It makes it so that one judge's decision is applied to an entire regional, and so that if a team makes one mistake in the beginning of a regional... They are penalized for the rest of it.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Technically it's not a penalty, rather, just a warning to watch for rough behavior. I find it hard that such behavior could occur accidentally. Keep an eye on your robot and if you see a referee making the pinning hand signals (it's hard to miss) back off.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
pinning isn't the only cause for a yellow card. also it isn't always cut and dry, things like ramming are largely a matter of interpretation. This rule would have worked better last year with the cut and dry definitions of the bumper zone and the lack of need for teams to have anything extending past the bumpers. this year however, the arms and manipluators will most likely reach well beyond the bumper zone.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I think this is great so that if you know that you have little to no traction, you can see who was rough at a time before. This way you know that they have been rough and you can stay away from them.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
It'll be nice to know who has penalties.
But, can you only get Red Card by getting a Yellow card first? If a team is disqualified WITHOUT getting Yellow first, will they have a yellow next match? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Personally I'm not sure I care for it, though I have mixed feelings. Sure, it's cool theatrics, but as in soccer it potentially penalizes the teams for separate and unrelated infractions rather than an MO of a certain act (the deterrence of which I'm sure is a major goal of the system). Unlike in soccer, yellow cards are persistent past one game, so two strikes and you're out, so to speak. I fear this has the potential to burn (for example) rookie teams that make two honest mistakes. I also noticed that the yellow flag rules for <T07> and <T09> represent a potentially strong and demoralizing positive punishment/negative reinforcement system that I haven't really seen in FIRST before, although that could be a helpful deterrent I suppose; still, the first thing that came to mind when I saw it introduced today was that it was like a team dunce cap. It's a little strange. Finally and perhaps most importantly, the rules are problematically vague about what actions, and to what degree they are carried out, warrant a card.
The upside of course (and I'm sure this is a main motivation behind instituting the system) is that there is much more transparency and legitimacy behind referees' warnings. It also encourages them to make warnings, and allows for them to promulgate and record them rather than allow teams to claim ignorance to warnings/suggestions/whatever they interpreted them to be (as many of us have seen in the past). I think this element is very good for the game, but whether the aforementioned potential downsides outweigh it we will only be able to tell after a couple of regionals. It all depends on implementation, and reminds us how important and tough officiating can be. Last edited by jonathan lall : 06-01-2007 at 23:03. Reason: correction - didn't properly RTFM re: red cards |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I'm all for it, last year we tipped over at one point and another team [who we eventualy grew to love] rather blatantly rammed our CMU camera and shooter mechanism... repeatedly. The new rule should keep anything unsportsmanlike from happening.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Lil' Lavery : 06-01-2007 at 20:59. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Canary Letter
I don't like it , it makes it too easy for students to have GP. they should have too decide if there actions on the field are first like
they need to learn to live like there grandmother is watching Last edited by colin340 : 06-01-2007 at 22:25. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: A letter from U.S.FIRST to sponsors, before the initial year | Andy Baker | Extra Discussion | 6 | 15-11-2006 13:38 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Letter to FRC teams from the United States Department of Commerce | dez250 | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 5 | 16-05-2005 22:47 |
| The Continuous Letter Sentence Game | xtremedarkness | Games/Trivia | 38 | 11-02-2005 10:12 |
| Dean Simmons and the Kamens Letter, Post IRI | Amanda Morrison | Off-Season Events | 4 | 14-07-2004 16:19 |