|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
The new one weighs too much for my taste.
Pavan. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
I really like the smart panels, you can get feedback, and make stuff work better with those, but from what i have been hearing, companies that have been donating components to FIRST have been complaining that teams haven't been using what they were donating. so instead of designing their components to be more team/weight friendly, they make the components that teams are using illegal. I really don't know who decided on that change, but if you read this, please feel free to contact me directly, i have some questions for you.
-Yoda |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
Quote:
A clearer post would help |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
I believe Yoda88 is saying that teams who have been donating parts aren't happy with how little their parts are being used; people have been turning to other companies instead. Rather than improving their donated products to be more appealing, FIRST has just changed the rules so that the other parts are not allowed.
Just to be clear, this is what I believe Yoda88 is saying, and is by no means necessarily what I believe myself. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
Wish they were letting us use the IFI panels... this other stuff is so kludgy. The IFI panel is so much lighter, more compact, and everything is centralized.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
Maybe we can expect an update in a few weeks allowing us to use it - much like last season. Atleast one could only hope. I took a look at the new ones and i'm not a fan of them. We've used the Smart Panel for the past 2 seasons. Personally, I don't think the way to get more teams to use stuff thats donated is going to be accomplished by making all other parts illegal. I'm reminded of the new batteries right about now...hmm...
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
<sarcasm>
We could always revolt... ![]() </sarcasm> No, I agree with FIRST if they decided against IFI breaker panels because the sponsors complained. FIRST only exists because of sponsors, and it would be horrible for FIRST to lose sponsors. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
Yep, no awesome panels this year. Major crapfest, but I guess it's not that big of a deal. Just another curveball. Seems like we're getting alot of those this year...
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
Those breakers were nice, but just think now FIRST is forcing us to be simpler.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
Quote:
But that new AB terminal block is kind of cool .. I will admit that. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
what i'm saying is that companies like Rockwell Automation have been complaining that FIRST teams haven't been using the terminal blocks and other components that Rockwell has donated.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
My feeling is that if somebody wants to donate something, that's terrific, but if it really isn't that good and people would rather use other parts available on the market they should be able to - rather than being force-fed all of the donated parts. I'm bummed.
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
I think FIRST wants us to use the parts that the sponsors give to kind of give those companies importance. If no one used those new panels this year than the company would feel as if it was a waste on their part of donating it. I think at the same time I think that the product has to be good. In this case the "klunky" panel is heavy and is less "capable" in my opinion comared the the smartpanel.
FIRST made a BIGGG mistake in my opinion and I hope they retract that rule at least this year and tell the company that supplied them that although the contribution is appreciated, it is not too practical Pavan. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Smart" Breaker Panel Acceptable for '07?
I'll venture another explanation: maybe FIRST wants to expose a future generation of engineers to more standard methods of interconnecting and protecting power circuits when the wiring is field accessible. While I agree with those who say the 2005 IFI breaker panel is very convenient and compact*, I wonder if it meets the same safety standards as the components that are required for 2007?
*and, BTW, easier to inspect. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "If Robots Get too Smart..." | RoboMom | Chit-Chat | 9 | 07-06-2006 01:10 |
| New NEMO White Papers! "Creating a Killer Packet" and "25 Ways to Sponsor" | Jessica Boucher | Team Organization | 0 | 10-08-2005 10:55 |
| "Thunderbirds" Vs. "Team America" Which one will rule the box office? | Elgin Clock | Chit-Chat | 3 | 07-09-2004 19:53 |
| Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? | gnormhurst | Programming | 3 | 22-02-2004 02:55 |
| 60Amp Circuit Breaker Mounting "Experience" | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:57 |