|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Getting on top vs letting on top vs other. | |||
| We will allow one partner robot to get 4" high on us |
|
7 | 3.02% |
| We will allow one partner robot to get 12" high on us |
|
36 | 15.52% |
| We will allow two partner robots to get 4" high on us |
|
6 | 2.59% |
| We will allow two partner robots to get 12" high on us |
|
144 | 62.07% |
| We will climb onto other robots at the end. |
|
25 | 10.78% |
| We will only score ringers until the ending buzzer. |
|
14 | 6.03% |
| Voters: 232. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Letting robots on top vs getting on top of robots
What about four long pneumatic pistons that would lift the bot so another bot can drive under it. It's easier than a lifting device. The rods would be in danger though, so the cylinders could push down aluminum rods that lift the bot. Once a bot is underneith, raise the rods.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are FIRST robots actually robots? | EHaskins | General Forum | 39 | 14-12-2006 21:40 |
| Getting good shots of FIRST robots | Billfred | Chit-Chat | 9 | 29-11-2006 08:18 |
| pic: Top Gun Top Wheels | Rick TYler | Robot Showcase | 4 | 04-02-2006 11:13 |
| Are the robots getting too heavy? | Peter Matteson | Rules/Strategy | 16 | 11-01-2006 16:36 |
| Top 10 Robots | Huskie65 | General Forum | 32 | 23-04-2003 20:14 |