|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Thanks for all your help...and a question
Question to Alan (or anyone),
I'm under the impression a >>1 instead of a /2 would work there and would (possibly?) be faster. We've tried this in some spots in code before, however, and I think it corrupts signed variables. Do you (or anyone) have any specific knowledge about the >> operator on this PIC? I was sort of hoping that it or some other operator will do a signed >> operation and carry the signed bit. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thanks J&J :O (And of course, all sponsors) | JC-75 | Thanks and/or Congrats | 0 | 05-04-2006 12:32 |
| Thanks for the help and parts, 340! | Joe Ross | Thanks and/or Congrats | 1 | 22-02-2004 00:09 |
| 'So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish' | Ashley Weed | Math and Science | 4 | 07-06-2003 13:43 |
| Thanks for the fun all... | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 24-06-2002 03:23 |
| Thanks for all your help! | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:01 |