|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
That design looks great. One big problem though. When you turn the wheel you motor will be beyond the limits of the robot frame. It could get damaged pretty badly or get stuck under another robot.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
Eugene, actually you don't. All you need for a swerve drive setup is 135 degrees of travel which can be contained within the bot. Motor reversing and programming gives you everything else.
Greg its a nice combination, but here are my concerns: Clearance within the robot is still a problem you'd have to design for a very open robot near the pods. More importantly, the banebots motor and trans seems to be a lot of extra weight hanging off to one side to be trying to swerve. Once you are in motion its not so bad but, but you still need to have a pretty hefty motor, reduction, as well as support structure for all of this to happen. -wayne Last edited by Waynep : 09-01-2007 at 22:28. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
Unless, of course, you add protection through some other means.
|
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
this was only designed to go 90 degrees....because maybe that is all we wanted
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
In that case you should have no problem with damaging it, so go for it
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
It would have a much smaller footprint if you put the gearbox and CIM motor above the wheel and sprocketed it down to the wheel.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
I'd suck it up and bevel gear it...then we'd be talkin
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Banebots- AndyMark crab module
I had a similar idea simply to use the motors and direct drive to the wheels. I wasn't going to pivot them. Does anyone know if the Banebots gearbox is strong enough to support a 120 # robot? (with pillow blocks of course)
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: AndyMark booth | Carol | Extra Discussion | 9 | 22-11-2006 15:44 |
| Inexpensive crab module? | Jeremiah Johnson | Technical Discussion | 20 | 24-04-2006 17:10 |
| pic: When One BaneBots Doesn't Do | team222badbrad | Robot Showcase | 7 | 07-03-2006 10:20 |
| pic: Tytus's Coax Crab Module | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 8 | 17-11-2003 10:08 |
| pic: 217 Gen 2 Crab Module Section view | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 2 | 28-04-2003 18:26 |