|
|
|
 I hate to do say it with these words but...We're all in this together. - dellagd [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I hate to do say it with these words but...We're all in this together. - dellagd [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#15
10-01-2007, 15:35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More Strategy
[quote=Tetraman;550772]I'm going to strongly disagree with the second part of your statement. My reason is that one robot lifted a foot gives the alliance the same amount of points a row of 5 does, or 3-4 rows of three rigs give you. It is much easier to get 30 points by lifting a robot rather than placing rings. 30 points is a big deal. It can bring you from 20 to 50, and in this game thats huge. Than just think about 60 for two robots up.
I agree that lifting will be important, but i ask you this do you really need 3 lifting robots on one alliance. NOOOO!!! if you have one robot that can lift two bots and maybe thats all it can do, two robots score and the other one "shines at the end." I also doubt that your robot will be great at everything. Keep It Simple Stupid!! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No More Teasers in 2007? | Madison | General Forum | 44 | 18-01-2011 15:22 |
| 2007 Canadian kick-off Jan-6-2007 media coverage | Mark Rozitis | FIRST In the News... | 3 | 07-01-2007 18:31 |
| [Official 2007 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2007 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 44 | 17-12-2006 17:05 |
| Strategy???? | dagger | Rules/Strategy | 14 | 29-01-2006 00:52 |
| White Paper Discuss: Simple strategy/couter-strategy sheet | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 06-04-2004 22:37 |
Threaded Mode