|
|
|
 I live for the offseason...that is, when i'm not living for the actual season. - Libby K [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I live for the offseason...that is, when i'm not living for the actual season. - Libby K [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#7
10-01-2007, 16:11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: <R12> 72" x 72" Size Restriction
I've been doing a little trig, and a little Paint.
 The square is the bounding box, the rectangle is the robot. The diagonal of the box is 72√2, the length of the robot is 38, and the wasted part of the diagonal in the lower left is 14. As such, I calculate that an object of negligible width can protrude (72√2)-38-14 = 49.8 inches from the front of a standard size robot. Is this consistent with our current interpretation? Does this make sense in the spirit of the rule? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there a restriction to what sensors we can use? | Robot Dude 0101 | Kit & Additional Hardware | 28 | 11-01-2005 22:43 |
| height restriction on pits | nzj1 | General Forum | 10 | 09-01-2005 21:34 |
| size limitations D: | Kevin Karan | Programming | 6 | 20-03-2004 21:20 |
| size | great_one411 | General Forum | 3 | 06-02-2003 09:02 |
| Ball size? | archiver | 2000 | 8 | 23-06-2002 22:24 |
Threaded Mode